The Shadow #1 (Oct.-Nov., 1973)

Cover to Shadow Comics #1 (1940). Art by Jerome Rozen.

Cover to The Shadow #8 (Sep., 1965). Art by Paul Reinman.

As memory serves, my younger self had very little knowledge of the Shadow when DC Comics first started promoting their upcoming title about him in the fall of 1972.  If asked, I probably could have told you that he was an old-time crime-fighting hero who had appeared both in pulp magazines and on the radio, though I doubt I could have told you which had come first.  And I’m all but certain that I had no knowledge that he already had a comic-book career behind him, with not only 101 issues of a titular series that ran from 1940 to 1949 (and that featured work by his primary writer in the pulps, Walter Gibson) but also a short-lived (and notoriously unfaithful) revival from Archie Comics in 1964-65 (the eighth and final issue of which coincidentally happened to come out just one month prior to my buying my own first comic book; from most reports, I was lucky to have missed this one, which might have put me off comics forever — who can say?). 

On the other hand, I was intrigued by what little I knew of the classic 193’s pulp adventurers (most of which I’d come by via Marvel Comics’ Doc Savage series, whose first issue had been released in July, 1972) — a group that I dimly understood to have been important precursors to the four-color superheroes I loved so much.

But even if I’d known nothing about the Shadow or any of his peers, I’m doubtful I could have resisted the full-page house ad that DC ran in its comics shipping in November, 1972:

The ad’s unsigned and uncredited artwork was by Bernie Wrightson, and most fans who recognized the young artist’s style must have anticipated that he’d be involved with the series when it eventually launched.  But when DC finally released the premiere issue of The Shadow in July, 1973– a full eight months after this ad first ran — the book’s illustrator wasn’t Wrightson, but rather that artist’s good friend and roommate, Michael W. Kaluta.

Knowing of that relationship, you might imagine that Wrightson, having decided for whatever reason not to do the project, simply handed it off to his pal.  But the story of how Mike Kaluta ended up as the artist on the series he’s probably still most closely associated with, fifty years on, is actually a bit more complicated than that.

The first person who appears to have been attached to The Shadow once DC had licensed the rights to the property from Condé Nast (who had themselves acquired them from the now defunct Street & Smith Publications) — and the only individual who’d remain involved with the title through its entire 12-issue run — wasn’t an artist at all.  Rather, it was Denny O’Neil, to whom DC gave oversight of the project not just as its writer, but as its editor.

O’Neil had been a freelance writer for DC since 1968, but for the last year and a half he’d also been working for the publisher as a freelance editor — an unusual, and perhaps even unique, arrangement for major American comics publishers at that time.  As he recalled decades later for an interview published in Comic Book Artist #5 (Summer, 1999):

[DC publisher] Carmine [Infantino] called me up one day and asked me if I wanted to edit some books and I’d be paid for it. I said, “Sure.”  I was a freelance editor which I think meant that they got an editor’s service without having to pay for the benefits.  I wasn’t officially on staff and paid so much per book.  As I look back, I was probably one of the worst editors in history.  I had no idea what the hell I was doing.  We had really good luck with some of the projects — The Shadow somehow came out very well despite my slipshod attitude.  But some of them didn’t come out so well.

Naturally, one of O’Neil’s first orders of business in regards to getting The Shadow up and going, if not the very first, was to find an artist.  Given the fame of the property — and the strong visual tradition established by pulp illustrators such as Jerome and George Rozen and Edd Cartier — it was a prestige assignment.  By his own account (in an interview for Alter Ego #123 [Mar., 2014]), O’Neil’s first choice was Jim Steranko, who in 1970 had written about the Shadow in the first volume of his History of Comics (and had also drawn him as part of the character montage that graced that volume’s wraparound cover).  Steranko was reportedly very interested in the job, but wanted more creative control than DC was prepared to give a freelance creator at the time, and so, it didn’t work out.  (The artist would nevertheless get to scratch his Shadow-shaped itch soon thereafter, as he almost immediately went on to paint the covers for a new series of paperback reprints of the pulp novels, launched by Pyramid Books in 1974.)

Another artist considered early on was Alex Toth, whose mastery of light and dark would seem to make him another nigh-ideal choice.  But according to “Shadow” expert (and former DC colorist) Anthony Tollin, whose recollections were included in an article by Philip Schweier published in Back Issue #89 (Jul., 2016), Toth didn’t like the script he was sent by O’Neil, and had a friend of his write an entirely new story, which he fully illustrated and lettered– and then sent to O’Neil, along with a bill for the unsolicited replacement script.  Needless to say, that didn’t fly with the writer-editor, and Toth’s work never saw the light of day, at least not in its original form.

Wrightson seems to have been the next artist brought in on the project (although it’s possible he was approached even prior to Steranko; as we’ll see momentarily, his and O’Neil’s memories appear to have differed on the matter).  As he told The Comics Journal in a 1982 interview:

…at the time I was up to my ears in Swamp Thing, and foolishly thought I could handle two books at one time…  I was penciling two pages and inking a page and a half a day.  I thought it would be a breeze.  Swamp Thing’s bi-monthly and I’ll fill in the other month with The Shadow.  Only it didn’t occur to me that I was taking the whole two months to do the book.  So I did the sample page and I think I was even slated to do the first issue of The Shadow…  And I came to my senses, fortunately, before ever starting on it.  And just said there was no way I could handle two books.  So I stuck with Swamp Thing.  It’s more in my line.  And they said, “Who’re we going to get for The Shadow?” and I immediately said, “Kaluta.”  And they didn’t hear that.  They said, “Who’re we going to get to do The Shadow?”  So then they went through all that bullshit with Jim [Steranko], I don’t know who all …

With the benefit of hindsight, it’s easy to agree with Wrightson’s assessment that Mike Kaluta should have been an obvious choice.  But in the period we’re discussing — late 1972 to early 1973 — Kaluta had never drawn a full-length story for DC.  Most of his published jobs to date — including various covers, a number of mystery tales, a single installment of the “World of Krypton” backup feature in Superman, and two continuing backup series (“Carson of Venus” in Korak, Son of Tarzan and “Spawn of Frankenstein” in Phantom Stranger) had come in at 10 pages or less.  Ultimately, it would come down to the artist being in just the right place at exactly the right time.

Three decades later, Kaluta told the story in an interview for Back Issue #10 (May, 2005):

This took place at the DC offices in the FDR post office building on Third Avenue. They had a coffee room that they shared with the Independent News Distribution Company, and that’s where I, being freelance, would hang out and just hope something would happen…  I was sitting with my friend Steve Harper, and Denny came in with Steve Skeates.  While making small talk, I asked what was up, and I remember Denny said they were contemplating who would draw The Shadow.  I asked, “Well, who would you want?”  Denny said, “Oh, Jim Aparo, but he’s drawing everything else.”  Harper started nudging me on the side, saying, “Ask him if you could do it.” So I asked, and this may be the Hollywood version, but as I recall, Denny held up his hand, palm out towards me, and said, “Wait a second.”  He got up, left the room.  We waited three or four beats, then he came back and said, “Okay. It’s yours.”

Kaluta didn’t have much more than a general familiarity with the Shadow before getting the job.  But, as he told Back Issue in 2005, that wasn’t a problem — at least, not for long:

When [Shadow fans] figured out it wasn’t Bernie but me [doing the book], packages arrived mysteriously at my door from all over the country.  There were tons and tons of character information, covers of the pulp magazines, and other visual information that kept flooding in.  So I sat like a spider in my studio as the Shadow reference piled up.

By the same token, the artist’s lack of experience working with the period setting that O’Neil had determined to use for the series turned out not to be an issue.  Acknowledging in the same Back Issue interview that nothing he’d done previously had indicated that he “could do the 1930s/1940s look”, Kaluta went on to note:

As it turns out, I could.  It was a surprise to me, and a delight.  Drawing the period material in The Shadow was like putting on a comfortable pair of socks.

Once given the assignment, Kaluta seems to have been given an unusual amount of time to produce the artwork for the first issue.  Among other considerations, this allowed him to develop a concept for the book’s cover that would evoke the painted covers of the old Shadow pulp magazines without his actually having to work in paint.  This ultimately involved producing two distinct pieces of artwork: the first, a wash rendering of the Shadow himself (which would in fact be partially obscured in the completed illustration); the second, a more standard inked drawing of the New York City skyline and elevated train,* which would be laid over the previous piece to create the final cover.

Of course, to have the desired effect in its ultimate form, this illustration would demand extra time and attention from the cover’s colorist.  Luckily for Kaluta (and for the rest of us), that job went to Jack Adler, who’d developed a washtone process for creating a striking, painterly look for select DC covers back in the 1950s.  In his Comic Book Creator #13 interview, Kaluta described the two men’s long-distance collaboration:

I did the Shadow figure in a black ink wash, so it’s just tonal, and then Jack just laid the colors on it. I was out of town when I did this.  I was in down there in Virginia and I wrote him a letter [see right]…  I included a little color photo of a Shadow cover by either Graves Gladney or George Rozen, that showed the colors I wanted and, of course, to pay homage to those cover painters.  Then I yapped for two pages and I wrote, “Just put the colors on, don’t drop any black into color because they’re doing that a lot…”  I went on and on and I said, “I want all the windows yellow.  I don’t want them pink and blue and green… I  want this, I want that, I want that.”  I heard back that Jack was stomping around the production room, saying, “Who does this kid think he is?  Does he think I haven’t ever done a cover before?”  But later, Jack said, “We did a great cover, didn’t we?”  I said, “Yes, we did, didn’t we?  Thank you for not f*cking it up by trying to be clever because there’s enough cleverness.”  I just knew what I didn’t want, and he did great.

It was a great cover — the first of several that Kaluta and Adler would produce for the title, using the same graytone process.  But for now, we’ll leave the subject of Shadow covers — both in general and in reference to The Shadow #1 — and turn past the iconic image featured at the head of this blog post to the first issue’s first story page:

While nothing in the story’s published credits suggests that “The Doom Puzzle!” is adapted from an earlier work, Philip Schweier’s Back Issue #89 article indicates that O’Neil based his tale on one of the Shadow radio program’s scripts (though no details are given as to which one).

Michael Kaluta appears to have had the above sequence in mind when making the following comments for a 1998 interview published in Comic Book Artist #5:

The most violence that appeared [in the Shadow series] was in the art.  Denny would say, “I’m not sure we should be doing this,” because, in that first issue I drew the Shadow actually killing somebody.  It’s very unsung, but it might be one of the first times under the Comics Code that a star of a book actually kills somebody in such an off-hand manner.  Strangely to us, we got a lot of crayoned letters demanding more and congratulating us for not messing around.

In his own CBA #5 interview, O’Neil offered his own reflections on the Shadow’s propensity for lethal violence:

I had a few little liberal qualms about his tendency to shoot first and not even bother to ask questions later.  I got around it by playing him as a god, as an impersonal force…  I didn’t want The Shadow to be perceived as a human being but as this impersonal force for justice that was always right.  If you make him human, then you have problems with the fact that he shoots people a lot.  I didn’t want to soften that as it seemed integral to the appeal of the character.  This guy dealt justice and to hell with due process!  As Steranko says, The Shadow didn’t believe in the death penalty, he was the death penalty.

While your humble blogger knows a bit more about the history of the Shadow today than in 1973, I’m hardly what you’d call an authority.  That said, my admittedly limited research indicates that “secret codes” were definitely a thing in his vintage stories, both in the pulps and on the radio show.

And, yes, O’Neil did come clean with the answer to the conundrum in this issue’s text page:

At this point in our story, O’Neil has efficiently introduced us to three of the Shadow’s agents — Shrevvy the cabbie, Margo Lane the socialite, and Burbank the radio operator — and is about to bring on a fourth, Harry Vincent.  We’re given no idea why these folks work for the Shadow, or even how any of them came into his orbit.  Nor are we given any hint that “Lamont Cranston” is anything other than the Shadow’s true civilian identity.  But, of course, as any moderately knowledgeable Shadow-head could tell you, the real Lamont Cranston is actually a completely different person, whose identity our mysterious protagonist assumes from time to time; the Shadow’s true name is in fact Kent Allard.  All of which is fascinating, to be sure, as are no doubt the various agents’ colorful backstories.  But none of that information is necessary for following the present narrative, or for enjoying it, and I think that O’Neil has chosen wisely in keeping his script for the series’ first installment focused on the “here and now” of his plotline.

And now, on to “the Upper East-Side apartment building owned by one Harry Vincent…”

O’Neil is a good enough writer (and editor) to resist the temptations to add narrative captions or dialogue in sequences where they’d be completely extraneous, as in the latter half of page 6, above.

Again, O’Neil doesn’t pause to explain how the Shadow received his mystical girasol ring as a gift from Czar Nicholas II of Russia, or to relate its origin as one of the two eyes of a Xincan idol; it’s enough for us to know that by using it, the Shadow is able to cloud men’s minds…

The Shadow explains that he’s now acquired two additional pieces of the puzzle, which now “almost makes sense!”  At this point, Burbank chimes in with yet another bit of data he’s just uncovered: “…a sea captain was among the prisoners who escaped from the van!”  Absorbing this new information, the Shadow announces to the two agents that a pattern is beginning to reveal itself…

The next day, “Lamont Cranston” heads to Wall Street, where he looks up financier Osgood Bamber.  Casually inquiring about “rumors of big excitement on the Street”, Cranston receives Bamber’s assurances that there’s nothing to get alarmed about…

Confident now that all the puzzle pieces are in place, the Shadow has Shrevvy drive him back to headquarters, where there’s much for he and his agents to do before nightfall…

Why?” asks Margo, as the autogyro takes again to the sky.  “The money shipment is already crossing the bridge.”  Which is true — but, as the Shadow explains, the “real culprits” are still at liberty.  Looking at his watch, he adds: “Unless I’ve miscalculated badly, they should be passing under us at this very moment!

Margo is sure that now, at least, their work must at last be done; not so, says her boss.  “We’ve captured a body of hirelings — but the head — the brain — is yet at large!”

“Then… you’ve failed?” asks Margo.

“The Shadow never fails!”

Does Osgood Bamber pull the trigger, inadvertently causing his own death?  Or does the Shadow do it himself?  Neither the art nor the script make it clear, suggesting that O’Neil and/or Kaluta might have been looking for some “plausible deniability” with the Comics Code Authority.  But, whatever the case, the Shadow’s clearly not going to lose any sleep over how things have turned out; rather, he’s having a good, long laugh over it as our tale reaches its end.


And so ends the first DC Comics issue of The Shadow — a debut outing that could hardly have been bettered, at least in the opinion of your humble blogger (now, as well as half a century ago)..  My younger self was more than ready to come back for that promised “next issue on sale during the second week in Sept.” — and for every two months after that, for as long as Denny O’Neil and Mike Kaluta could keep it up…

…which, as most people reading this probably already know, wasn’t nearly as long as one could have wished.  But, naturally, that’s a topic for discussion in another post, at a later date.

 

*One of the most distinctive elements of Kaluta’s foreground drawing — and one of the most fanciful — is the lighted sign for “Revilo’s”.  In a 2013 interview (later published in Comic Book Creator #13 [Fall, 2016]), the artist recalled:

My dad said, “My friend Frank Oliver has a kid who is a big comics fan, so you put his name in there somewhere?”  So I put Oliver in backwards, “Revilo’s.”  And then, some friend from Canada told me, “Oh, there are some guys who are big fans of yours called The Revillos and they’ve got a little New Wave rock song out,” [laughs] which they got off of this.  I said, “Do they know that it’s ‘Oliver’ backwards?”  He went, “No, they haven’t the slightest idea.”  I said, “Well, maybe you should tell them just for the hell of it.”

The Revillos — or, as they were originally and later known, the Rezillos — formed in Edinburgh, Scotland in 1976.  Described by Allmusic as a “crazed and joyous Scottish pop band with one foot in punk rock and the other sunk in 20th century kitsch”, the comic-book origin of their name was verified by founding member Jo Callis, who said in a 2005 interview:

There was an early 70’s DC comic called ‘The Shadow’ . The Shadow was a real pulp fiction character. The very first issue of that comic has in one of its pictures the Shadow standing there with his two guns and his mask. There is a street scene in the background and what was meant to be either a club or a bar. It was actually called “Revilos”with one “L” and we took that and changed the letter to a “Z”. I think we probably had the name before we had the band.

Ironically, the original incarnation of the Rezillos only lasted a couple of years, after which several members soldiered on for a couple of decades under the more comics-authentic variant name the Revillos — though the 21st century has found the band billing itself once again as the Rezillos.

And no, I have no idea whether any of the members in any configuration of the group have ever worked out that “Revilo” is just “Oliver” backwards.  But really, after 47 years, does it matter?

 

24 comments

  1. frasersherman · July 1

    I’d read a couple of the Bantam paperbacks by then so I did know who the Shadow was. I wasn’t blown away by them (I liked them much better rereading them a few years back) but I was hooked on the book. It’s a shame we eventually wound up with Frank Robbins on art, but at least we got #6’s “Night of the Ninja.”
    Interesting O’Neil was so squeamish about having the Shadow kill people; in light of the Punisher and the Fleischer Spectre on the horizon, it sounds amusingly old-fashioned now. Which is not a criticism, though I didn’t have a problem with it: the Shadow being 1930s made the hardcore approach okay.
    It does amuse/annoy me that while “the Shadow kills people” has been considered perfectly acceptable ever since, almost every Doc Savage comic shudders at the thought “he brainwashes criminals to turn them honest!” But of course Doc’s supposed to be a nice guy (and is) where the Shadow’s not. Speaking of which, O’Neil did much better with the Shadow than his god-awful later effort to reboot Doc (https://frasersherman.com/2014/08/10/the-other-doc-savages-dc-tries-something-new-sfwapro/)

    Liked by 2 people

  2. John Minehan · July 1

    I liked this, but much prefered the second and third issues.

    Those stories seemed better thought out. Given this article, I see why: Denny O’Neil had no idea what artist he would be working with,

    Liked by 1 person

  3. FredKey · July 1

    Enjoyable entry indeed! I had picked up that issue in a bin at Comicon (before it became the crazed cosplay party it is now) but didn’t remember much about it. I also got a stack of the pulps with the new covers sometime around 1980 in a used-book shop. And I have enjoyed the old Orson Welles radio broadcast’s I’ve heard. Fascinating character, works in every medium—except, weirdly, movies and movie serials.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. DontheArtistformerlyknownasfrodo628 · July 1

    I’m putting the timeline together backwards, but I think it fits. Alan, you might remember when we were kids that for awhile in 1970 or ’71, the Jackson rock station WZZQ-FM ran old radio serials at 10pm, Monday through Friday nights. The two I remember best are the old Lone Ranger serials and…The Shadow. That was my introduction to the character. I have no idea if I’d ever heard of it before then or not, but when DC introduced the comic in ’72, I was very excited. I remember being surprised that the character in the comic couldn’t turn invisible and was unprepared for much of the violence, but it wasn’t long before I discovered the novels and read enough of them to know the character’s true orgins.

    This book was such a treat when it first came out and it has only improved with age. Kaluta’s artwork is beautiful and for whatever faults he may have had, O’Neill even gets the cadence of 1930’s radio heroes right. This was a great book that I’m proud to say I still have a copy of today. It’s a shame it didn’t last longer, and as Fraser says, it’s a shame we had to put up with Frank Robbin’s god-awful pencils before it was done, but talk about an auspicious beginning. After the cheesy enjoyment of the 1994 film starring Alec Baldwin, it’s nice to get back to something that takes the material seriously and remembers what the character is really supposed to represent. Thanks, Alan.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Chris A. · July 1

      I never saw the Baldwin film, but I have heard that you see his nose grow before your very eyes when he transitions from Lamont Cranston into the Shadow. A few seconds from that would make a funny GIF video file!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Chris A. · July 1

        As for Frank Robbins, he was in fine form – rather like Milt Caniff – on the “Johnny Hazard” comic strip of the 1950s, but by the ’70s his comics were the dictionary definition of turgid.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Chris A. · July 2

          Correction: turbid. 😉

          But have a look at Robbins on “Johnny Hazard.” Fine strip.

          Liked by 1 person

  5. Chris A. · July 1

    Another classic comic from 1973! I own a number of these, and only wish Kaluta had stayed on the series longer. Seems he really wasn’t cut out for a monthly or bi-monthly series, and, like Wrightson, was better suited to the short story format.

    Speaking of 1930s/40s pulp adventure and such like, I just saw “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.” It is my favourite of the sequels and closest in tone to “Raiders of the Lost Ark.” Superb finale to the series.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Chris A. · July 2

    Kaluta also drew the Shadow on the cover of Batman #253 which was published the same month as The Shadow #1. I suspect it was to further plug the new series, though Mike had done a few previous Batman covers as well.

    https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/marvel_dc/images/6/62/Batman_253.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20081128191451

    Liked by 2 people

    • Chris A. · July 2

      Just a reminder: this fall Fantagraphics will be releasing a Web of Horror compendium of issues 1 -3, published in 1969-70, and the unpublished issue 4. It was successfully crowdfunded, and one of the perks for contributors were printed watercolour and ink images by Mike Kaluta of an odd amalgam of Webster (a spider creature which served as the host of the stories) and, since Kaluta was famed for drawing him, the Shadow. What a mashup! You can see them here.

      https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-complete-web-of-horror#/

      Liked by 2 people

  7. frasersherman · July 2

    For what it’s worth, my own review of the Bronze Age Shadow, from about seven years back: https://frasersherman.com/2016/05/08/the-other-shadow-sfwapro/

    Liked by 2 people

  8. sockamagee · July 2

    I enjoyed this series. One of the good points about it is that DC and O’Neil managed to keep The Shadow close to it’s original source in pulps. It is frequently intimated but never firmly established that Cranston and The Shadow are one and the same. This makes The Shadow a mysterious figure to the reader.
    Unfortunately in the radio series it was revealed to the listener at the beginning of each episode by the announcer that Cranston and The Shadow were the same man, destroying the mystique of the character.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Henry Walter · July 2

    Thanks for another enjoyable review! Regarding the potential artists for the Shadow: I love the house ad by Wrightson. It’s too bad he couldn’t have done an issue or two. Also, the Alex Toth sample looks phenomenal! You mention that it didn’t see the “light of day, at least not in its original form”. What did become of the Toth issue? Finally, it was interesting to read that Denny O’Neil wanted the great Jim Aparo as the Shadow artist. Any insight as to why, when the Shadow did team up twice in the next year with Batman, those stories were in Batman rather than Brave & the Bold? Speaking of Brave & the Bold – I don’t think you’ve reviewed an issue since #93 in December 1970. Had you stopped buying that title in the early 70s? I hope not. I’d love to see some upcoming B&B reviews!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Alan Stewart · July 2

      Bernie Wrightson may have never drawn an issue of The Shadow solo — but he did at least pencil part (maybe even as much as half!) of issue #3, which we’ll be covering here in a few months.

      Regarding Alex Toth’s rejected (if that’s really the right word) Shadow job, in an interview in CBA #5 Mike Kaluta speculated, “That series he [Toth] did called The Fox was probably from the layouts he did for a Shadow pitch.” (I’m guessing that Kaluta was referring to one of the “Fox” stories Toth did for Archie Comics’ “Black Hood” revival in 1983, though I don’t know that for sure.) The idea that Toth could have repurposed some of the art from a completed Shadow story, as opposed to simply layouts from a “pitch”, is just further speculation on my part.

      As to why the Batman/Shadow team-ups occurred in Batman rather than Brave and Bold, I’m guessing that Denny O’Neil called dibs. 🙂 (Although O’Neil wrote the B&B #93 that sent Bats to the House of Mystery, that seems to have been a very unusual instance of editor Murray Boltinoff letting anyone but Bob Haney write that series.)

      I actually bought B&B on a fairly frequent basis throughout the mid-1970s; the fact that I haven’t yet written about an issue published after 1970 is simply down to no issue since #93 having made the “cut” for getting its own post (I bought a *lot* more good comics back in the day than I have time to write about within their 50th anniversary window, alas). But I’ll see what I can do! 😉

      Liked by 3 people

      • Henry Walter · July 3

        Thanks for the info. I look forward to learning about Wrightson’s involvement in your coverage of Shadow #3!

        Here’s hoping some of the B&Bs from your collection make the cut soon for your 50-year attack!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Tactful Cactus · July 4

        I consider myself lucky that I was just entering my teenage years when so many great comics were coming out, and Kaluta’s Shadow is right up there with the best. Thanks for the extra info that I didn’t know about.

        I always liked the juxtaposition of Kaluta’s scratchy foreground figures on the covers, with the more tonal Shadow towering over them in the background. It would also have been nice to see Wrightson’s smoother inks over Kaluta’s pencils on a full issue. And only now reading that Aparo was considered for the job, I think that would’ve been a great fit as he was still in his grittier, scratchy period at that time.

        Most of all, thanks for that nugget regarding the origin of the Rezillos/Revillos name, which I had no inkling of when I was a slightly older punk buying their records and seeing them live back in Scotland in the late-seventies.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Bill B · July 4

        I hope BatB 111 and 115 (“The Corpse That Wouldn’t Die”) make the grade.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Alan Stewart · July 5

          Alas, Bill B, neither of those issues were among the choices I made at the spinner rack the month they came out. Sorry to disappoint!

          Liked by 1 person

  10. Joe Gill · July 5

    Really loved The Shadow, was absolutely one of my favorites back at that time. I’m kind of amazed it didn’t sell, given the quality of the writing and the art. As for this particular issue I remember being thrilled that O’Neil didn’t resort to some formulaic origin story. The Shadow’s stock in trade was mystery, aloofness. Let him be mysterious, same with the secret identity. I absolutely loved the way O’Neil didn’t linger on that and , I believe didn’t even clarify The Shadow wasn’t Cranston until what? Maybe issue # 7?
    For years after I read this every time I’d see a small plane moving slowly I’d wonder, is it an Autogyro?
    As I’ve mentioned before it really is an art to string together a narrative with so few words, to bring the reader along with a few simple declarative sentences. Like how Harry Vincent’s line “Make yourself at home, but not too much at home” speaks volumes about his character. Or The Shadow’s “you call it bedlam I call it the vengeance of the Shadow,” his arrogance and attitude on display in a few sparse words.
    I’d like to comment on what you, Alan, touched on about the writer’s sort of reluctance with the level of violence inflicted by the Shadow. It was useful to look back, remember a time where there was at least debate about such things. Now of course with heads exploding all over the TV on streaming and “first person shooter” video games it’s almost hard to remember a time when there was actually a level of concern at all over how much and what sorts of violence to display.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Chris A. · July 6

    Comics like these – which didn’t last terribly long – were mini-series before the phrase was used in the industry. Rima the Jungle Girl and Ragman are but two other examples .

    Like

  12. slangwordscott · July 7

    I’ll be the guy who speaks up for Frank Robbins. At the time I mildly disliked it, but I’ve come to recognize Robbins’ inky style is a good fit for the Shadow’s pulpy mood. Following Kaluta, though, he could not win. Just too different an aesthetic. It would have been interesting to see the reception had Robbins been the initial artist. But then we probably would not have gotten any Kaluta Shadow, and that would have been a damn shame.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Pingback: Amazing Spider-Man #129 (February, 1974) | Attack of the 50 Year Old Comic Books
  14. Pingback: The Shadow #3 (Feb.-Mar., 1974) | Attack of the 50 Year Old Comic Books
  15. Pingback: Master of Kung Fu #17 (April, 1974) | Attack of the 50 Year Old Comic Books

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.