Savage Tales #4 (May, 1974)

As we previously discussed in our post about Savage Tales #3 last October, back in the fall of 1973 it seemed that Marvel’s one-and-only sword-and-sorcery-centric black-and-white comics magazine was about to be cancelled — for the second time.  The first incarnation of Savage Tales had seen but one issue published in January, 1971 before Marvel’s then-publisher Martin Goodman pulled the plug; then, the second iteration, launched in June, 1972 following Goodman’s departure from the company he’d founded, had come under the scrutiny of an auditor for the conglomerate (Cadence Industries) that now owned Marvel.  According to a rather downbeat editorial by Roy Thomas that ran in ST #3, a go-ahead for producing further issues wouldn’t be given until sales numbers had been received for the relaunch; and if you read between the lines, the signs didn’t seem very encouraging.

Happily, however, March, 1974 brought us a new issue of Savage Tales after all.  As Thomas’ considerably more positive editorial for ST #4 put it, sales for the second coming of the magazine had not just met expectations, but had exceeded them, to the point that current publisher Stan Lee hadn’t just put the title back on the schedule; he’d actually increased its release frequency, from its former (alleged) quarterly to a more robust bimonthly.  Needless to say, it was very good news for Conan fans.

Marvel marked the occasion of Savage Tales‘ reprieve with the best-looking cover the magazine had seen yet; its painter, Neal Adams, was also represented within the book’s contents, beginning with its contents page:

Regarding that “collectors-item CONAN PIN-UP” mentioned at the bottom of the page: like the big black arrow indicates, it was to be found on the inside front cover… and the inside back cover, too, printed horizontally across both, so that the only way to see it complete and unobstructed was to detach the cover from the magazine — and who wanted to do that?  Fortunately, thanks to the miracle of digital reproduction, we’re able here to view P. Craig Russel’s fine (if clearly Barry Windsor-Smith-inspired) drawing as a whole piece (and in its proper vertical orientation, to boot):

From here, we move on to the magazine’s all-new, 21-page lead feature.  It’s introduced by a page which, following the standard epigraph from Howard’s fictitious Nemedian Chronicles “Know, O Prince…” goes on to let us know where this episode comes in the chronology of Conan’s long snd eventful career:

And now, on to the story proper…

As with all Marvel Conan tales of this era, the script — an adaptation of a non-Conan story by the character’s creator, Robert E. Howard — in unambiguously attributed to writer-editor Roy Thomas; the art credits, however — for “Gil Kane, Neal Adams, & Diverse Hands”, with no indication of the division of labor, and with an additional credit for Pablo Marcos for “tones” — are rather more vague.  But if one consults a couple of different accounts offered by Thomas more than four decades apart (the first coming in the letters page of Savage Sword of Conan #2 [Oct., 1974], the second in his introduction to Savage Sword of Conan: The Original Marvel Years Omnibus #1 [2019]), one can work out reasonably well how the job seems to have come together.

Thomas appears to have first enlisted Gil Kane to pencil the adaptation, after which Adams was brought in as inker (although he notes in his Omnibus intro that Adams’ contribution “included adding some modeling to the figures”, which suggests — at least to me — that he may have done a certain amount of pencilling, as well).  However, despite inking “most of the figures and major panels throughout the story” (quoting here from the SSoC #2 letters column), Adams ultimately ran into deadline problems (shocking, I know), which required the editor to parcel out parts of the job to other embellishers, including Frank McLaughlin, Vince Colletta, and Pablo Marcos (who was evidently also solely responsible for adding gray tones to the art); in the SSoC #2 lettercol, Thomas makes a point of giving Marcos complete credit for doing all the inking on two particular pages: the opening splash page shown above, and a second full-page splash later in the story.

As noted earlier, “Night of the Dark God” is based on a Robert E. Howard short story — more specifically, “The Dark Man”, which was first published in the December, 1931 issue of the pulp magazine Weird Tales (and which can be read in its entirety online for free, here).  The hero of the original tale is Turlogh Dubh O’Brien, an 11th century Irish warrior (another Turlogh story, “The Gods of Bal-Sagoth”, was previously adapted by Thomas and Kane in Conan the Barbarian #17-18), and its setting is Ireland and the Scottish Hebrides; since Howard essentially based his imaginary Cimmerians and Vanir on the real-world Celtic and Scandinavian peoples of medieval Northern Europe, the mapping of the historical Middle Ages to the fantastical Hyborian Age works pretty well, with one significant exception we’ll mention a bit further on.

Conan promises the fisherman he’ll bring the boat back if he’s able; and, after tossing him a sack of coins for surety, sets out across the lake, leaving the other man standing “more alone with his thoughts than he has been for many a long year.”

Among the figures from past issues of Conan the Barbarian shown in this montage (the second of the story’s full-page splashes that were inked entirely by Pablo Marcos, per Roy Thomas), we have the Man-Serpent from issue #7, Yag-Kosha from #4, Borri the Grey God from #3, and Thak from #11.  (It’s possible that the young lady at top left is supposed to be Kyrie from #17 and #18, though the costume Gil Kane drew her wearing in those issues was somewhat different, and that the hooded skull-visage next to her is intended to be the Living Tarim, as seen in the last panel of #26, though he may also be simply a symbolic representation of Death.)

Conan’s reverie ends, and as the story returns to the present, he spies another boat — a somewhat larger one than his, though definitely not a Vanir vessel — drifting on the waves ahead of him.  He sees no living crew — only dead bodies, lying strewn across the deck…

Pablo Marcos’ gray tones are really lovely on the page above (I would assume he used a wash technique here, versus the screentone he employed in a story for Dracula Lives #6, published earlier this same month… but I could easily be wrong) — especially in that final panel.  Who needs color, I ask you?

Making landfall, Conan pulls his boat up on the shore, then makes his way inland across a rocky landscape until he spies the buildings of the Vanir settlement.  Before he can draw any closer, he suddenly hears a sound…

Conan remains hidden until the two men reach the main building of the settlement and carry the statue inside.  He then steals forward, but before he reaches the door, he encounters another Vanirman.  The struggle between the two warriors is brief, with Conan slaying his foe before the latter can raise an alarm…

I mentioned earlier that there’s one significant element in Howard’s original story “The Dark Man” that doesn’t make a smooth transition from its 11th century European setting to the adaptation’s imagined Hyborian Age, and that element is the role of the priest.  In the short story, Thorfel is a pagan Viking who kidnaps a Christian priest to legitimize his forced wedding to an Irish maiden who’s Christian as well.  But there’s nothing in Howard’s stories to indicate that the people of Cimmeria have any more use for the worship of Mitra — the most widely worshiped deity in the supposedly more civilized Hyborian kingdoms to the south — than do their fellow barbarian Northerners, the Vanir.  So Thorfel’s forcibly recruiting a Mitraist cleric to perform his and Mala’s nuptials, rather than simply calling on one of his own clan’s holy men, seems entirely random, and fails to carry the weight that it does in Howard’s original tale.

The narrative captions tell us that, at first, Thorfel simply stands silently in place, watching Conan carve a path through his warriors…

In Howard’s “The Dark Man”, the Picts’ god is revealed not to be Brule the Spear-Slayer, but Bran Mak Morn — the hero of several historical fantasies by Howard, all set in Roman Britain sometime around the late third century C.E..  Brule is an entirely appropriate substitute for the adaptation’s Hyborian timeframe, however, given that Howard specifically identifies him in this story as being Bran’s distant ancestor (he name-checks Brule’s good buddy, Kull, in this same scene as well, just as Thomas does above).

Fifty years after I first read it, “Night of the Dark God” remains one of my very favorite Marvel Conan stories, both for how it movingly explores a rarely seen, but very human, side of its larger-than-life hero, and for the somber majesty of its artwork — which, regardless of how many hands might have been involved in its production, nevertheless holds together as a coherent whole, at least to my eyes.

Next up in Savage Tales #4 is Roy Thomas’ triumphal editorial; that’s followed by a text article by Erwin Stevenson about the 1963 fantasy film Jason and the Argonauts, which is succeeded in turn by a 1955 comics story reprinted from Black Knight #2.  This historical adventure yarn, scripted by an unknown writer and drawn by Joe Maneely, concludes the origin story of “The Crusader”, the first chapter of which had been reprinted nine months previously in Savage Tales #2.  As in that earlier installment, the series of bloody medieval religious wars we know as the Crusades is here framed mostly as an opportunity for such figures as the fictional titular hero, the Muslim-raised El Alemain, and his newly-claimed liege lord, the historical English monarch Richard I (both shown in the panel at right) to win renown through their deeds of knightly prowess and valor.  This dated approach may earn a few points with contemporary readers for portraying the main Muslim leader, Saladin, as a figure of honor and courage equal to that of his Christian enemies, but even that isn’t likely to do much to mitigate the sense of pointlessness surrounding the whole business.

Following “The Crusader” is another text feature, and one that’s a little more on point that the previous movie-themed article, being the first half of a two-part history (written by Roy Thomas himself) of the Gnome Press publishing program that did a lot to keep Conan alive as a literary property in the three decades between Robert E. Howard’s death in 1936 and the advent of the Lancer Books paperback series in 1966.  It’s followed by the issue’s final comics story (and final feature overall): a re-presentation of “The Dweller in the Dark”, a 16-page tale that had been originally produced by Thomas and artist Barry Windsor-Smith for the original iteration of Savage Tales in 1971, but, left homeless when publication of the magazine was suspended after the first issue, had only seen print in a slightly cleaned-up and (per comments made by Thomas in this issue’s editorial) poorly-printed color version in Conan the Barbarian #12.

Since my younger self had in fact bought, read, and still owned a copy of Conan #12, I imagine that I wasn’t especially excited about seeing its lead story reprinted here, regardless of the promised better reproduction, or even the potential for seeing a bit more female skin than was offered in the previous version.  Still, that’s no reason for me not to give “The Dweller in the Dark” the full blog treatment here, seeing as how I didn’t write a post about Conan #12 back in September, 2021 (for no better reason, really, than that I’d recently blogged about both the 10th and 11th issues) — and also considering the fact that it would be a shame not to share Windsor-Smith’s exquisite artwork for the story, given this second chance to do so.  And so, without further ado…

Writing about this story in his 2018 book Barbarian Life: A Literary Biography of Conan the Barbarian, Vol. 1, Roy Thomas admits to being initially “a bit taken aback by the stringy little ‘shirt’ he [Conan] wore, but it grew on me; at least it was different, and its swirling produced a nice motion effect in many panels, starting with the splash page.”

It’s very interesting to compare Windsor-Smith’s artwork for this story with that for his and Thomas’ much more recent adaptation of “Red Nails”, as published in Savage Tales #2 and #3.  While the artist’s skills had definitely grown and matured in the years between these two efforts, I think it’s fair to say that even circa 1971, Barry Windsor-Smith was hardly what you’d call a slouch.

One difference that’s worth noting between the two jobs concerns how the artist approached inking for black-and-white reproduction — specifically, his liberal use of screentones to add texture here (something which might have contributed to the printing difficulties Marvel encountered with Conan #12, perhaps?), versus the strict line-art technique he employed for “Red Nails”.

Conan soon settles into a comfortable routine as Queen Fatima’s captain; but, after a few weeks, he gets a little restless, and decides to see just how far his authority  — and his liberty — extends.  He is subsequently greatly displeased to discover that “his” guards have orders to slay him should he ever try to leave the palace.  “Then I’m to be kept — like some slavish lap-dog?” Conan demands to know.  “The life of a palace dog is sweet, barbarian”, one of the guards blithely replies.  “Enjoy it — while it lasts.

As already mentioned, the artwork for “The Dweller in the Dark” had to be modified a bit for its presentation in the Code-approved Conan the Barbarian #12, mainly in the area of female semi-nudity.  Most of the differences are quite subtle — a few more bangles added to Queen Fatima’s costume in this or that panel for the color version — though the contrast is arguably slightly more dramatic here, in Yaila’s bathing scene:

A more subtle change — one that you might not even notice, unless you were looking for it — is the vertical extension of the artwork in virtually every panel, so as to make it fit the dimensions of the standard comic-book (versus magazine) page.  (Note, for example, the addition of the greenery to the top of the trellis in the last panel above.)  These alterations were evidently made in-house at Marvel by persons unknown, rather than by Windsor-Smith himself, who may have been living in England at the time.*

One last thing to note here before we move on, and it’s that there is a third version of the artwork for this scene, as well as for several other panels where Windsor-Smith’s renderings were apparently deemed too racy even for the non-Code-approved B&W format.  Shown at right is artwork (first published in Comic Book Artist #2 [Summer, 1998], and currently on view at this comicartfans.com page, as are the other supposedly twice-censored panels) that’s been purported to be Windsor-Smith’s original pencils, “rescued” by the artist after they’d been photostatted, and inked by him at a later date; I use the word “purported” advisedly, since these panels clearly include the extensions that are supposed to have been added by anonymous hands at Marvel months after the original job was complete.  (In other words, I’m not exactly sure what these panels are, other than Barry Windsor-Smith’s preferred version of the scene [circa 1998] — but I figured that if I didn’t bring them up, someone else might.  So, here you go.)

And now to return to our narrative…

Coinan and Yaila are promptly marched down to a partially-submerged dungeon beneath the palace, where they are chained to the wall, then left to await the tender mercies of what Fatima ominously refers to as “the Dweller in the Dark”.  Once they’re alone, Conan asks Yaila for the lowdown on this so-called Dweller, but she doesn’t know much…

In Barbarian Life, Roy Thomas tells us:

…though I believe the original idea had only been to make the Dweller an octopoid monstrosity, when Barry drew it he gave the creature a quasi-human face.  That, in turn, inspired me to add captions during its battle with Conan to the effect that once the octopus had been as human as the Cimmerian…

Conan attempts to free Yaila, but, naturally, he’s soon snared by one of the Dweller’s tentacles as well…

Bracing his back against one side of the stone shaft and his feet against the other, while bearing Yaila’s weight as well, Conan makes a tortuous ascent, ultimately reaching the trapdoor at the shaft’s end.  Neither he nor Yaila has any idea what’s on the other side, but Conan figures it can’t be any worse than what’s behind them…

Conan’s decision to toss Queen Fatima to the Dweller evidently caused consternation for some fans when this story was first published in Conan #12 in 1971 — not so much because our hero had just ruthlessly killed an enemy in cold blood when his life wasn’t in immediate danger, but because he’d killed a woman… and Howard’s Conan was supposed to have a strict code against killing women (at least according to these fans).  Responding to these complaints in Conan #16’s letters column, Thomas allowed that he might have goofed, but wasn’t prepared to fully commit to that notion unless and until someone could supply him with “an actual Robert E. Howard quote” to back up the claim “that Conan’s code forbids him to kill a woman”.  Even so, the writer-editor confessed that he wished “he had worded Conan’s dialogue… so that he didn’t say he ‘killed’ her [as the hero does in the Conan #12 panel shown at right] — but rather that he had merely dropped her into the pit… [as Thomas would indeed change Conan’s dialogue to read in Savage Tales #4’s re-presentation, as shown above]”.

(For the record, I don’t know if any disgruntled fan ever met Thomas’ challenge to pony up a Howard quote to support their position — if they did, their letter wasn’t published in Conan the Barbarian, at least as far as I’ve been able to determine — but by the time the author wrote Barbarian Life, he was suggesting that the whole toss-Fatima-in-the-pit business might have been Barry Windsor-Smith’s idea in the first place, and stating that it was “something I wouldn’t do if I had it to do over.”)

Back when I first read this story in 1971 — or re-read it in 1974 — I’m sure it never occurred to me that Yaila might turn up again… and I’d be willing to lay odds that it didn’t occur to Roy Thomas back then, either.  Nevertheless, when the writer returned to writing Conan stories for Marvel in 1990 after a decade away, he arranged for return appearances for a number of old characters, and Yaila was among them; in Conan the Barbarian #250 (Nov., 1991), readers learned that she’d continued to reign in Zahmahn, apparently wisely and well, and had taken a nice fellow named Godrik to be her consort somewhere along the way.  It’s good to know that happy endings actually stick sometimes, don’t you think?

But, in any event, we’ve reached the end of Savage Tales #4.  All that’s left to share is this full-page ad for Savage Tales #5:

Besides the nice illustration by John Romita that graces it, this promo is notable for something else — namely, that with the exception of the second half of Roy Thomas’ Gnome Press article, none of the features listed here actually appeared in the magazine itself, when it showed up on stands in May.

What had happened in the interim between issues?  As would be explained by yet another Thomas editorial — this one entitled “Savage Tales Is Dead!  Long Live Savage Tales!” — sales reports for the magazine had continued to be good… so good, in fact, that Conan (and his fellow Robert E. Howard-created heroes) were being spun off into another, larger, black-and-white magazine, The Savage Sword of Conan, the first issue of which would be coming out in June.  Meanwhile, Savage Tales would continue, but with a new headliner:  Marvel’s jungle hero Ka-Zar, Lord of the Savage Land, who had in fact appeared with Conan in Savage Tales‘ first, genre-fluid issue, way back in early ’71.

Naturally, most of the features that had originally been promised for Savage Tales #5 were held back, to be included in the first issue of Savage Sword.  And so, we had this single transitional issue of the latter title — which, behind another fine cover by Neal Adams, featured a reprint of a Ka-Zar tale that, like “The Dweller in the Dark”, had originally been intended for Savage Tales, but had instead seen print only in a slightly sanitized version in Astonishing Tales, the color comic that had been Ka-Zar’s Code-approved stomping ground for the last several years.  Savage Tales #5 also included a reprint of a story featuring author John Jakes’ knockoff Conan character, Brak the Barbarian, that had originally appeared in color in Chanber of Chills #2 (Jan., 1973), and of course there was the previously noted Gnome Press text piece.

But the lead feature — which also comprised the only new comics content in the issue — belonged to Conan himself, as the Cimmerian adventurer exited Savage Tales in high style via the 20-page “The Secret of Skull River!”, scripted by Roy Thomas from a plot by the aforementioned John Jakes, and illustrated by Jim Starlin (penciller) and Al Milgrom (inker).  Your humble blogger was greatly hoping to share this story with you more fully, but the calendar for this coming May is looking a bit too tight to afford a full post to Savage Tales #5.  So, we’ll have to content ourselves with this random, out-of-context selection of pages from the story, which hopefully will at least give you a sense of its flavor… especially if you click ’em to embiggen ’em.

Roy Thomas notes in his Savage Sword of Conan: The Original Marvel Years Omnibus #1 intro that the story had “perhaps more of a Marvel mainstream look than previous Savage Tales Conan stories.”  That’s probably true as far as Barry Windsor-Smith’s artwork in the previous four issues goes, but is perhaps a bit less credible in regards to Gil Kane and Neal Adams’ efforts in ST #4, considering how many Marvel superhero comics the latter two talents had drawn between them over the years (not to mention the fact that Kane was drawing the vast majority of covers for Marvel’s color comics at this time).  Still, you can sort of see Thomas’ point.  The dynamic yet design-heavy style employed by Jim Starlin in this story is very much of a piece with the stuff he was currently wowing comics fans with over in the pages of Captain Marvel; and, in the spring of 1974, served as further proof (if any was still needed) that there were many viable approaches artists could take in delineating the adventures of Robert E. Howard’s most famous hero.  And what better place to explore those approaches than in a black-and-white anthology magazine — one that had the liberty to jump around from point to point in Conan’s chronology, without worrying about the sort of issue-to-issue continuity that couldn’t easily have the Cimmerian tromping through the snowy wastes of Aesgaard in one story, and slogging through the jungles of Vendhya in the next?

Still, those were possibilities that would have to be explored in the new Savage Sword of Conan title, rather than in Savage Tales.  The latter would, however, soldier on as a showcase for Ka-Zar — as well as for jungle-themed adventure in general, with a sprinkling of sword-and-sorcery — for some time to come.  My younger self bailed on the title after the seventh issue, so I was somewhat surprised to discover while researching this post that Savage Tales lasted for another five issues, not giving up the ghost until July, 1975.  By that time, both the magazine and its star (who was also holding down his own self-named solo color title at this point) had pretty well fallen off my radar.

The Savage Sword of Conan, on the other hand, would prove a very different story… though one we’ll need to wait a few months to begin to tell.  See you in June, dog-brothers!

 

*See Craig Miller, “Still Waiting for the Absolute BWS Conan Volumes”, Spectrum Super Special Vol. 1, No. 3 (Nov., 2005), p. 134-135.

22 comments

  1. Tactful Cactus · March 30

    This was the first Conan comic I ever bought, and it remains my favourite to this day. It’s also the first time I laid eyes on Conan as drawn by Adams, and my already considerable admiration for the artist based on his DC work increased even more. The cover is my ideal of what Conan should look like, more so even than Frazetta’s version. The Adams cover for ST#5 just reinforced that opinion. The contents page drawing was nice, too, as was the PCR pin-up. I was tempted to remove the cover to see it in full, but thankfully thought better of it.

    The original story by REH is also a favourite, and it’s one of the best examples of Thomas reshaping one as a Conan story. The combination of Kane and Adams works wonderfully well, but then Adams was always a sympathetic inker for other artists. His influence seems especially strong on Conan’s close-ups. Panels inked by Colletta are impossible to miss, but not too intrusive. I also had the colour version of this in a Giant Size reprint, but it’s nowhere near as effective as the B&W.

    I think it was also my introduction to Barry Smith’s Conan, although it’s possible that Marvel UK had recently started the B&W reprints of his run on the character at this time. The Romita drawing was an unexpected bonus. The Starlin art in the next issue was also my intro to his work, and I’d have been pleased to see more of him on the character.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. patr100 · March 30

    I never really got into the Sword & Sorcery comics , though I can still see the quality of Barry Smiths work, though as often is the case the inker makes the difference. I think there is even better work than in the above samples. I also recall the selective pages that he inked for Kirby’s Bicentennial Battles Treasury, which I still have somewhere and like it or not, added a new feel to Kirby’s work.

    Anyway, we all can spot Gil Kane’s nostrils, fingers and cheekbones a mile off and I really enjoyed his work mostly , though his poses recur in such a similar way -specially on his many covers – that he appears to be swiping his own work – eg the legs in the splash page of Conan with the huge ape – looks so familiar.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. John Minehan · March 30

    But, he’s not wearing a haubick https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hauberk.

    I think the Priest of Mitra was used as a closer cognate to the Catholic Priest in the first story. Howard’s story, Queen of the Black Coast has a scene where Conan talks about is faith in Crom, a demiurge who created the world and then takes no action other to give people courage at their birth). However, he also admits that he has learned from the cult of Mitra (and that of the thieves’ god, Bel) and he (“venerates” is too strong a word) regards them highly.

    Thinking about this, given his religious tradition, would Conan necessarily come to this view if he had not been exposed to it before? If the cult of Mitra is somewhat cognate to Christianity, would they not have missionaries among the Cimmarian tribes, as Catholic Christianity had missionares anong the pagan Gael and Scots Tribes?

    Another way to look at it is that Mala ni Hafgar is a convert to the Cult of Mithra. This makes seeking a Priest of Mitra more likely/ Since Mala ni Hafgar is from another tribe it is possible that she has some connection to Conan’s family. Given Conan’s later respect for the Cult of Mithra, possibly his mother was, liewise, a convert.

    In the historical Europe, the Scots and Gauls lived outside the Roman World, as did the Danes. Saxons, and Norse, as the Vanir are more remote than the Cimmarians. The lmore remote people were slower to convert, as reflected in the story, perhaps as a function of their greater distance from the Roman (or Hyborian) World.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Alan Stewart · March 30

      It’s reasonable to assume that the Mitraists could have made some converts among the Cimmerians. However, Mala’s invocation of Dagda and Diancecht, deities whose names come from Irish mythology (there are no such references in Howard’s original text, btw) make it pretty unlikely that she’s one of them.

      Like

      • John Minehan · April 1

        The interesting thing is that the Irish Gaelic word “Dagda” means “Good” (in the sense of “proficient”) and the Irish Gaelic word “Diancecht” means “Intensity.”

        Like

  4. Steve McBeezlebub · March 30

    ‘Who needs color, I ask you?’ Me. Aside from not liking Neal Adams’ art very much and being meh on Conan, black and white art in comics always feel unfinished to me.

    Liked by 1 person

    • frasersherman · March 31

      They reprinted the Dark Man story in color in a Conan tabloid. It’s definitely better without.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Steve McBeezlebub · March 31

        And that’s why there’s chocolate AND vanilla. 

        Liked by 1 person

  5. DontheArtistformerlyknownasfrodo628 · March 30

    I wasn’t a big reader of Marvel’s B&W books for another couple of years, so I missed this one. That’s a shame, because there’s some really good stuff here. On that P. Craig Russell, frontispiece, you can talk about Smith influences all you want, Alan-and there are certainly many there-but look at the turn of that right leg and the shape of the foot and the way it hits the floor, that’s Kane, all the way and it’s beautiful. Like BWS, Russell’s work had it’s own explosion of quality coming, but he was an excellent comics artist even before that happened.

    Night of the Dark God is a great story; beautifully drawn and written and, as you pointed out, a rare moment of vulnerability for our favorite Cimmerian. Of course, once I read Conan was going home to seek out his old childhood girlfriend, I knew she was going to die, but they way Mala would have rather taken her own life than marry a man against her will was really well-done.

    As for Dweller in the Dark, I’d seen the color version of the story already, but the B&W version is such an obvious improvement on the inferior color art, it was like getting to read a whole new version of the tale.

    My only problem with Marvel’s B&W line was all the text articles (I know, cheaper postal rates), and reprints and filler that didn’t matter to me. The stories I enjoyed were usually great, but the amount of material I had no interest in usually outweighed the good stuff by such a large margin, it wasn’t worth buying most months. Still, I should have bought this one. It’s a keeper. Thanks, Alan!

    Liked by 4 people

  6. John Minehan · March 30

    I always liked the synergy of Adams and Kane.

    The Kane/Adams collaborations (I’m thinking of Blackmark, particularly) are fascinating: a master of dynamic anatomy meeting a master of realistic (almost photorealistic) art.

    I’ve read that Adams, when he was asked about taking over GL from Kane, when Kane was moved to The Flash, initially wanted to see if he could do a version of Gil Kane’s GL.

    It is not what it became, but it could have worked.

    And some of the Kane/Adams Conan faces look like someone you’d see in Marty Burke’s Tavern before Burden Iron Sgut down.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. patr100 · March 30

    Talking of the transfer from B & W to colour, we have an example above, I wonder if there were any Code issues in the amount of blood you could depict in the colour version?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Alan Stewart · March 30

      I think that there would have been. And what little blood you could get away with under the Code seems to have always been colored black.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. frednotfaith2 · March 30

    Reading this entry was the first time I’ve seen anything from this mag, but much enjoyed the overview and selections from the excellent artwork. Don’t recall ever seeing a Kane/Adams collaboration before. Results, with Marcos and whoever else was involved, came out very well — interesting to me to spot those parts that are very much in Kane’s style and those that look much more like Adams. Smith, IMO, had already risen to the level of one of the top-echelon artists in mainstream comics by the time he drew the story herein even if he was still improving his craft. The scenes with Yaila while she was bathing were rather amusing — whether in the distant past or the present, people don’t typically bathe while wearing clothes or happen to have a handy bit of clothing available floating in the water while doing so just in case someone happens to come by. Smith’s preferred version was the more realistic, but, well, can’t titillate the readers too much, not even in the more adult-orientated b&w mag! The octopoid with the humanesque face looked creepy as hell. As to Conan dumping the old queen into the pit with the octopoid and the “code” — I wonder if such a code about not harming women ever really existed among any peoples, barbarian or not, in the ancient world. Best as I can tell, from reading various accounts of ancient warfare and attacks on civilian populations, it doesn’t appear to have been the case at all. If women were “spared” at all, it was only so that they could be sold as slaves or become the unwilling concubines of the men who had murdered their fathers, husbands and sons. The idea of any sort of “code” regarding the treatment of women seems more likely an invention of chivalric romance novels and their ilk than of reality. Of course, in the modern world of the last 100+ years, bombs don’t distinguish between the sexes at all. 

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Sort of weird to think of Conan having any sort of code against killing women. I feel like some readers mentally gloss over the morally ambiguous qualities of the character to try to make him more noble than he actually is. After all, Conan has been a mercenary, a thief and a pirate; he’s no paragon of virtue, by any means! Yes, he operates according to his own personal moral code, but it’s *very* different from what we think of as “good” or “heroic” in the modern era. I can certainly see him killing a woman if it was to save his own life, or if he felt provoked enough. The later was definitely the case here, as he clearly was at the end of his rope with Queen Fatima, and he knew he couldn’t trust that she wouldn’t stab him in the back at the first opportunity.

    Anyway, beautiful artwork on both Conan stories in this issue. I agree with Alan, the black & white really enhanced the work of both Kane / Adams / Et Al and of Barry Windsor-Smith.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. John Minehan · March 30

    What you mentioned is pretty much accurate. 

    After Alexander’s conquests there was a glut of slaves that reduced labor rates for Centuries and cut off things like what Hiero of Alexandria was doing around the same time. 

    The Roman Congust of the Eastern Med, Gaul, the Eastern Med and Pannonia over the next few centuries continued the flow of Slaves. What did have an effect were plagues, such as those around the end of Marcus Aurilius’s reign and the Plauge of Justinian that proabbly eneed the Classical World.

    Now, the weapons available before Gunpowder made it harder to decimate populations. Additionally, being known for slaughtering unarmed women and children did not, in itself, improve a military rep. However, some major powers, for example, the Assyrians and the Mongols cultivated reputations for almost genocidal techniques.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. frasersherman · March 31

    I don’t recall Conan having a code against killing women. I don’t recall him killing any women in REH but that’s not the same thing (it’s pretty obvious he’s willing to rape “The Frost Giant’s Daughter” when he catches her). Like “Doctor Doom is a man of honor” it’s just an assumption tacked on because the character is cool.

    According to John Phillips’ biography of Saladin, presenting him as a chivalrous man of honor (and he certainly qualified as much as most of the “great” European knights did) was standard in fiction for long before this, so that the Crusaders had a worthy foe to fight against. That doesn’t excuse the good guy/bad guy formulation though.

    Liked by 1 person

    • John Minehan · March 31

      Killing women (or non-combatants generally) was somewaht frowned upon in traditional societies that prized personal, martial skills.

      Which is not to say, it was not done. 

      Part of the training for Spartiates in the Agoge was quietly assassinating Helots who were seen as disruptive or rebelious. During the 14th Century, Men at Arms in Sir John Hawkwood’s White Company looked at the opportunity to rape nuns (unlikely to carry veneral diseases) during sacks of cites as a fringe benefit per contemporary documents quoted in Barbara Tuchman’s Distant Mirror, her history of the 14th Century.

      War is about killing people and breaking things. Conan was a fictional Soldier, in pre-modern armies and war-bands.. 

      Liked by 1 person

      • frasersherman · March 31

        And the Greeks in the Iliad IIRC are planning to kill all the pregnant Trojan women, then take the rest into sexual slavery.

        Liked by 1 person

        • John Minehan · April 1

          The fairly recent book, Absolute War by Chris Bellamy (a British Historian known for his expertise in Soviet Artillery), goes into detail on the loss of control of Russian Soldiers by Commanders during the capture of Berlin in 1945 and the open season on rape of German women (and even Russian female troops).

          Some of this is NOT planned . . . .

          Liked by 1 person

          • frasersherman · April 1

            After liberating part of North Africa, Patton warned the local leaders to expect some rape from his troops as part of the celebration. The Union’s General Butler, who occupied New Orleans in the Civil War, issued a directive that any woman who disrespected a union soldier should expect to be treated as a common prostitute.

            I have no problem, however, with fictional characters drawing a line about such practices. Bernard Cornwell’s Sharpe had two rules for his platoon: no stealing from locals (you want them with you not against you) and no rape.

            Liked by 1 person

  12. John H · April 1

    What a great issue, I still have it dog eared but still resplendent with its glorious art work. Kane’s title page and splash page are superb but it’s the story telling of both Kane and Smith that excels. Crikey what an embarrassment of riches Adam’s, Russel, Smith. Not then knowing the history of Conan I loved the article on the Gnome press as well.
    Thanks for a nice retrospective Alan, I love the sample of Smith’s uncensored art work, it was even more heavily censored in the British weekly reprints than in its American counterpart.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. John Minehan · April 6

    It is funny how much Neal Adams took the edge off Kane’s characteristic “up nose shots” of the early to mid 1970s; By the late 1970s, Kane stopped doing that . . . .

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.