Sword of Sorcery #4 (Sep.-Oct., 1973)

Last December, we looked at the first issue of Sword of Sorcery — DC Comics’ new (as of December, 1972, that is) bi-monthly series featuring author Fritz Leiber’s fantasy fiction duo, Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser.  The debut of the two roguish heroes in their own title came five months after their introduction to DC readers in Wonder Woman #202, courtesy of writer Samuel R. Delany, artist Dick Giordano, and editor Denny O’Neil — the latter of whom, not so coincidentally, would be not only editing DC’s new sword-and-sorcery title (the company’s first ongoing effort in that genre), but scripting it, as well.  SoS #1’s art, meantime, was contributed by a young penciller named Howard Chaykin, with inks by the mysterious “Crusty Bunkers” (whom, as we’d soon learn, consisted of various talents working out of the Continuity Associates studio run by Neal Adams and Giordano.) 

Following the first issue’s adaptation of Leiber’s short story “The Price of Pain Ease”, issue #2 offered another such, as “Revenge of the Skull of Jewels” was based on Leiber’s “Thieves’ House”.  O’Neil and Chaykin were again the primary storytellers for this one, for which the Bunkers again supplied the inks (although an error led to them being unlisted in the book’s credits).  A more significant error led to issue #3’s “Betrayal!” carrying no credits whatsoever; according to issue #4’s letters column, the story (not a Leiber adaptation this time) was again by O’Neil, with art by Chaykin “and about a dozen of Howie’s artist pals” (per the Grand Comics Database, this group is likely to have included Bernie Wrightson, Michael Kaluta, Walt Simonson, and Alan Weiss, among others).

The primary subject of today’s post, issue #4, introduced a slight change in format, as the book offered not one but two stories.  The first of these was yet another Leiber adaptation — this time of “The Cloud of Hate”, a story originally published in the May, 1963 issue of Fantastic magazine:

Again, the script is by Denny O’Neil, while the art is credited to “Chaykin, Inc.”  Turning again to the Grand Comics Database, we find that both Walt Simonson and Sal Amendola are supposed to have helped out with the pencilling of this issue, while Amendola reportedly did all the inking.

Hypothesizing that this mysterious fog might also be in the business of stealing silver and gold, and that they might find such loot by trailing the phenomenon to its source, Fahhrd and the Gray Mouser follow their quarry out beyond the walls of the city, towards an encampment of traveling merchants. There, observing from cover, our heroes wait to see what will transpire next…

I think that the preceding scene is supposed to be funny, but it falls pretty flat, at least for this reader.  Why would anyone post such a useless idiot as a guard, if they were actually serious about guarding something?  (For the record, there’s no corresponding scene in Leiber’s original story.)

But, moving on… Faf and the Mouser proceed to enter the cave, and after traveling for some time through a dark tunnel, emerge into a large, torch-lit space, and are amazed…

I won’t hazard a guess as to which of our pencillers rendered page 9’s splash (though if you twisted my arm, I’d have to say Simonson), but it’s spectacular, in any case.

Fafhrd’s statement that the priest’s complaint on page 9 about there having been a lack of strife in recent times “explains” why things have been quiet in Lankhmar lately is, frankly, baffling, as it does no such thing.

Coming to his friend’s aid, Fafhrd is gratified to find that the cloud-tentacles are solid enough to be sliced through — still, that only provides a momentary respite for the pair, since, as the Mouser notes, their enemy has dozens more appendages where that one came from, “…and most bear weapons!

Fafhrd and the Mouser seem to have forgotten about the mob of worshipers that presumably still lie between themselves and the cave entrance — but I guess that’s OK, because I’m pretty sure Denny O’Neil has forgotten about them, as well.

In our look at Sword and Sorcery #1 six months back, I noted that O’Neil’s adaptation of “The Price of Pain Ease” hit most of the story beats of Leiber’s original tale, but stripped out the underlying character motivations that made that adventure something more than a light-hearted romp.  Something of the same sort happens with his take on “The Cloud of Hate” where the whole point of the title — that the cloud-entity actually instills hatred in those it touches — is something we’re mostly told about, rather than shown.  In the source material, the reason that the rogues Gnarlag and Gis attack our heroes is that they’ve been infected by the cloud, so the fight has a point.  In this version, it’s just an extraneous, barely-motivated action scene, as superfluous in its way as the later “comic relief” bit with the guard.  I dunno… perhaps the story should have been retitled “The Cloud of Weapons-Wielding Tentacles”, since that seems to be what O’Neil was most interested in.

Oh, well; at least it looks nice, right?  An assessment which I’m happy to say also applies to the issue’s second story:

As with the issue’s lead story, “The Prophecy!” is scripted by Denny O’Neil, while the art — for anyone who might need help deciphering his dinosaur-shaped signature — is by Walt Simonson (whom, as we’ve noted, also anonymously assisted Howard Chaykin on the art for both “The Cloud of Hate!” in this issue and “Betrayal!” in the last one).

The 26-year-old Simonson (whose more-or-less contemporaneous self-portrait, dated Oct. 30, 1972, is shown at left) already had a four-year degree in geology from Amherst College behind him (he’d originally intended to go into paleontology to study — you guessed it — dinosaurs), as well as a second degree in art from the Rhode Island School of Design, when he broke in at DC Comics in the summer of 1972.  As he recalled decades later for an interview published in Comic Book Artist #10 (Oct., 2000):

The first day I went to DC, I walked into the coffee room there and, to the best of my memory, Bernie Wrightson, Michael Kaluta and Howard Chaykin were sitting around talking together.  I think Alan Weiss was also there, and they were all doing work for DC.  I knew all their work, and for some reason, Howard and I just hit it off, maybe because we were so different.

While his instant rapport with Chaykin led directly to his working for O’Neil on Sword and Sorcery, the artist’s earliest assignments at DC (officially speaking, at least) came from a couple of other editors: Joe Orlando (“Cyrano’s Army”, published in November, 1972 in the 10th issue of Orlando’s Weird War Tales, was Simonson’s first professional comic-book credit) and Archie Goodwin (who assigned him a couple of short stories that ran in Star Spangled War Stories #170 and #172, respectively).  The latter association with Goodwin would prove to have a dramatic impact on the young artist’s career… but more about that in a bit…

Fritz Leiber had been writing about Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser off and on since the late 1930s, and had written one tale of the Mouser set prior to his first meeting with his partner-to be (“The Unholy Grail” [1962]), but had never explored the early days of Fafhrd until relatively recently, in 1970’s “The Snow Women”.  O’Neil thus had a basic foundation on which to write new stories of the heroes’ youths, but one that left him with a good deal of room for going his own way.

In his Comic Book Artist #10 interview, Simonson confessed that at the time he was helping out on Sword of Sorcery #3 he was so unsure of his ability to draw people (or, at least, people that he himself hadn’t designed) that he mostly limited his contributions to objects and backgrounds.  In Sword of Sorcery #4, his command of the human face and form seems quite assured — with the possible exception of the last panel on page 4, where, even allowing for foreshortening, Faf’s hands simply look too damn big.

“The Prophecy!” may be a slight story — of course, at a mere 6 pages (and the first of those a symbolic splash), you could argue that it could hardly have been anything else — but O’Neil’s script gets the job done; and Simonson’s art is impressive throughout, with the expressions he gives the long-faced Fafhrd being particularly charming.

And the young artist’s success here was a good portent for the immediate future, as with the very next issue of Sword of Sorcery he’d be taking over as penciller of the title’s lead feature.  What happened to Howard Chaykin, you ask?  Considering the difficulties he’d had in getting a complete job of pencils done solo for the last three issues, you might hazard a guess that the young artist had come to the conclusion that the book’s bi-monthly schedule was just too much of a challenge.  But you’d be wrong — at least if we’re to judge by what he actually did next.  Because Chaykin’s very next gig would involve his taking on even more of the work of producing an ongoing bi-monthly comic for DC, with August, 1973 bringing the release of Weird Worlds #8, featuring the book-length debut of “Ironwolf” — a new strip created by Chaykin, for which he’d handle the complete art (at least at the beginning) as well as the plotting (though the scripting, as well as editing, would be by Denny O’Neil).

We’ll have more to say about Weird Worlds #8 in a couple of months, but we’ll go ahead and close out our coverage of Sword of Sorcery with this post, beginning by noting that issue #5’s lead story, “The Sunken Land”, was another Fritx Leiber adaptation, once again scripted by O’Neil (in probably his most successful effort at capturing the essence of one of Leiber’s stories); in addition to being pencilled by Simonson, it was inked by a recent arrival in NYC from Detroit, Al Milgrom; Milgrom also inked the issue’s backup feature, “The Mouse Alone!”, a tale of the Gray Mouser’s early days (back when he was known as Mouse) that took Leiber’s “The Unholy Grail” as its starting point in the same way that issue #4’s “The Prophecy!” had “The Snow Women”.  This one was scripted by George Alec Effinger, a young science fiction writer who’d recently done some work for Marvel, and pencilled by a friend of Milgrom’s from Detroit named Jim Starlin, who’d been quite busy at Marvel in recent months, but who was making his DC Comics debut with this story.

It was a good issue — though not quite good enough to stave off cancellation.  Sword of Sorcery #5 would prove to be not only the final issue of the series, but also the last stab DC would take at a sword-and-sorcery title for the next year and a half.  Still, none of the principal creative talent involved on the series would go hurting for work; while Effinger opted to concentrate on prose SF henceforth, his collaborators on “The Mouse Alone!”, Starlin and Milgrom would find themselves ever busier at Marvel.  Chaykin, naturally, would be occupied with “Ironwolf” (at least while it lasted), and O’Neil would also be kept busy writing (and sometimes editing) a variety of features at DC, with perhaps the most notable being The Shadow.  As for Simonson, he was already collaborating with Archie Goodwin (the latter serving as scripter as well as editor) on a new strip called “Manhunter”, which began its seven-issue run in Detective Comics with issue #437, released in July.  (Fear not, we’ll have more to say about both The Shadow and “Manhunter” in future posts — the former as early as next month, the latter [alas] a few months later.)

Comic-book readers hadn’t seen the last of Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, either, although they’d have to wait until 1990 for the roguish duo’s next foray into the graphic story medium. In that year, Marvel (under its Epic imprint) would release a four-issue miniseries offering adaptations of seven of Fritz Leiber’s stories, as pencilled by Mike Mignola (who also drew the covers), inked by Al Williamson, and scripted by… Howard Chaykin.  Among issue #3’s adaptations was “The Price of Pain Ease”, which Chaykin had of course previously illustrated from O’Neil’s script in Sword of Sorcery #1; somewhat ironically (if not really surprisingly), his own script proved considerably more faithful to its source material than its 18-year-old predecessor.   Funny how things work out sometimes…

19 comments

  1. frasersherman · June 21

    I agree, O’Neil never quite got Fafhrd and the Mouser the way Roy Thomas got Conan. As I loved the Leiber stories, I felt deeply frustrated the comics couldn’t generate the same magic. Like I said in comments on SOS#1, the lack of the careful continuity we got in Conan the Barbarian didn’t help.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. DontheArtistformerlyknownasfrodo628 · June 21

    As seems to be usual when either Marvel of DC happen to hit the motherlode with a particular title or character (ie: Conan), the first attempt or two of the other company to capitalize on that success usually falls short. I don’t know if O’Neill didn’t understand what made Conan so successful or if he just didn’t care, but the scattershot nature of the Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser stories, as well as his insistence on action without the requisite character-building the original stories contained, certainly didn’t help. They sure were pretty, though. With names like Chaykin and Simonson, you’re talking about artists who weren’t yet among my 15-year-old faves, but soon would be. Honestly, while I had been familiar with Chaykin’s work for years, he didn’t really blow me away until his iconic American Flagg for First Comics, which was still almost a decade away at this point. Simonson, on the other hand was about to impress me in a big way with his work on the Manhunter series with Archie Goodwin. While I enjoyed a realistic artist like Adams, the stylistic work of Simonson and later on, Marshall Rogers and others was really exciting to me and exemplified the best of what comics were supposed to be about. There are some really exciting comic book stories in our near future, Alan, and I can’t wait until we get to all of them.

    As for this issue of this book, as I say, it was very pretty. The art in the first story, whoever it’s by, has a very definite “Windsor-Smith” look to the embellishment that’s quite appealing, and I agree Alan, that the big splash panel had to have been drawn by Simonson. Beautiful stuff.

    O’Neill’s writing here is clunky, at best. I get the impression that Denny didn’t care much about this book or the characters, or maybe he was just too overworked to do it properly, but lines like, “So, my blooming manhood is put to the test!” don’t do the story or O’Neill himself any favors. The scripts here read like a first draft that the writer never got the chance to update and the lack of character building, especially between our two heroes, diminishes the riches of the original stories.

    Thanks for the chance to check out a pre-Manhunter Simonson story I’d never read, Alan. It’s a great way to whet the appetite for what’s to come.

    Liked by 1 person

    • frasersherman · June 21

      O’Neil said in the letter column of the first issue (IIRC) that he loved the Leiber stories. But no, that clearly didn’t help him do the stories right. The discussion of the art makes me want to drag them out and reread them though.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Alan Stewart · June 21

      In the interest of managing everyone’s expectations, I feel like I should probably note here that I only bought one copy of the Goodwin-edited Detective (with Manhunter) new off the stands. (You can see which one in the blog header.) I didn’t get heavily into Simonson until a little bit later, at which time I was able to scoop up those Detectives as back issues at a still-reasonable price — but that won’t help us here, where we will (as always) be at the mercy of my purchasing decisions from 50 years ago. 😦

      Like

    • Chris A. · June 22

      In 1969 Denny did write three issues of DC’s Showcase (#s 82-84, I believe) with Nightmaster, a sword & sorcery series that predated Marvel’s Conan, but that one didn’t take (despite Joe Kubert covers, and interior art on the latter two by Wrightson, Jones, and Kaluta).

      Liked by 1 person

  3. DontheArtistformerlyknownasfrodo628 · June 21

    Well then, Alan, since you dropped the ball fifty years ago, you’ll have to be sure you revisit that “one” issue of Detective with a Manhunter story that you did buy, and use it to do an indepth analysis, not just of the entire Goodwin/Simonson series, but also of Manhunter as a character. I wasn’t familiar with him at the time, but apparently, as I’ve learned over the years, dude has quite the history. Just consider it extra homework to make up for what you didn’t do in the first place. LOL.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Chris A. · June 22

    I own all five of these, and loved the series. Wrightson helped with inks in 1, 2, and 3, but not 4 and 5.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Chris A. · June 23

    Speaking of Denny, I hope you’ll be reviewing O’Neil and Kaluta’s The Shadow #1. Loved the full page Shadow advert Wrightson did in Kamandi #2, though he only assisted Kaluta on The Shadow #3 and 4.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Alan Stewart · June 23

      Look for it a week from tomorrow. 😉

      Like

      • Chris A. · June 24

        Great news! By the way, I never saw those Mignola-pencilled Fafhrd & Grey Mouser stories for Epic, though I do remember his Elric comics for First a few years earlier. How, in your opinion. did these Leiber adaptations come across, compared to Sword of Sorcery (which I really enjoyed, despite some inconsistent inks in #3 and 4)? The creative team certainly sounds good.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Alan Stewart · June 24

          Well, they all *look* great. The only one I’ve actually read through at this time is “The Price of Pain Ease” (the only Leiber story adapted in both series), and, as I indicated in the post, it’s the superior adaptation of the two. I do look forward to reading the rest of the series one of these first days. 😉

          Like

  6. John Minehan · June 24

    I liked this book, I liked the two heroes of very different temperments and skill-sets. At the time, I had not read any Lieber, but I think O’Neil captured the atmosphere well, based on my later reading of these stories.

    I do agree that he did not capture the substance, but not a bad job.

    I thought the Conan appearance in the Starlin story was a nice touch.

    Milgrim was a Murphy Anderson assistant and it shows here and on his near contemporaneous CPT Marvel work at Marvel with Starlin , , , ,

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Chris A. · June 27

    Disappointing that you missed such a seminal book, though many have talked about Batman #251 online:

    http://bronzeagebabies.blogspot.com/2013/12/batman-251-review.html?m=1

    This one is as good as any, except the scans come from a reprint, not the original. The splash of Batman running was one of Neal Adams’ most iconic images of the character.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Brian Morrison · July 12

    Sadly, this was the last issue of Sword of Sorcery that I managed to find back in 1973. I had bought the first issue but had missed 2 and 3 and would subsequently miss issue 5. I was disappointed to find out shortly thereafter that the comic had been cancelled. So many of the comics that I had been collecting had recently been cancelled – Green Lantern, Teen Titans, Forever People, New Gods and reprint titles like the short lived Wanted, Inferior 5, Doom Patrol, Metal Men etc. I was becoming more disenchanted with DC as they were only publishing ca 10 titles a month that I wanted to buy. I remember branching out from my core superhero comics purchasing, trying comics like Prez, Strange Sports Stories, The Shadow, and even Plop. I was also starting to pick up more Marvel comics from second shops and was starting to piece together the larger interconnected Marvel world which would result in me going full Marvel in just under a year’s time.

    Anyway, loved the stories and art in this issue and disappointed that the title would soon be gone.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Pingback: Weird Worlds #8 (Nov.-Dec., 1973) | Attack of the 50 Year Old Comic Books
  10. Pingback: Captain Marvel #29 (November, 1973) | Attack of the 50 Year Old Comic Books

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.