Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu #1 (September, 1974)

While this blog has briefly touched on the matter of Marvel’s 1974-75 line of “Giant-Size” comics in a few previous discussions, this is the first time we’ve devoted a post to a book in that fairly short-lived format.  So, I hope you all won’t mind if we take a little time here at the top of the page, before we flip past Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu #1’s Ron Wilson-Mike Esposito cover to take a look at this issue’s specific contents, to get into a little background on the introduction and early days of the “Giant-Size” format in general.  It’s an interesting story (at least in my opinion) that seems to indicate a certain degree of disorder in the Marvel offices around this time — disorder which might rise to the level of full-on chaos, but then again might not, depending on your point of view. 

On the other hand, if you do kinda mind — whether because you came here strictly to read about Shang-Chi, or because you simply don’t care all that much about the behind-the-scenes stuff, or because of, well, any other reason — no worries.  Just click here to skip ahead, and the rest of us will catch up with you in a bit.  (Hey, I’ll never know if you click or not, so there’s no need to worry about hurting my feelings.)

For those still with me… our story begins with the following full-page house ad, which ran in various Marvel comics during the month of February, 1974 (for the record, this particular scan comes from Creatures on the Loose #29):

Obviously, Marvel was no stranger to the concept of “giant-size” in early 1974.  Even setting aside the reprint books, like Marvel Tales and Marvel’s Greatest Comics, which had thrived for years in a 64-page format before moving more recently to a “standard” 32-page size, there were their well-remembered, (mostly) all-new Annuals of the 1960s, and even a couple of late ’60s titles that had come out on a regular bi-monthly schedule at the 64-page size (at least for a while) — Not Brand Echh and Silver Surfer.  And then there was the very brief initiative in the summer of ’71 to make the whole line giant-sized (i.e., 48 pages for a quarter).  But to launch two new monthly giant-size books at the same time (more or less) seemed like a pretty big deal.

Fans who flipped from this house ad over to the month’s Bullpen Bulletins page were granted further details, including that the new 35-centers would be 48 pages long (same as ’71’s 25-centers) — or 52 pages if you, like the Bullpen, counted the covers — and that the unnamed “colossal companion-mag” to Giant-Size Super-Stars that was mentioned but not named in the ad would be called Giant-Size Chillers.  Like GSSS, GSC would be published monthly; also like it (and like The NBC Mystery Movie, a then-current TV “wheel series” whose original line-up of McCloud, Columbo, and McMillan & Wife was evidently a direct inspiration for Marvel’s concept), it would rotate its lead feature spot among three different (but all horror-oriented) strips: The Curse of Dracula, Werewolf by Night, and Man-Thing.

What prompted this sudden push towards a larger, pricier format?  To some extent, it was simply one more in a long series of attempts by the major American comic book publishers to come up with a product that was more attractive to retailers and distributors who, under the old newsstand distribution system, made significantly less profit per item on comics than they did more expensive magazines; the late-1973 expansion of the “100-Page Super-Spectacular” format by Marvel’s main rival, DC Comics, was another example from around this same time.  That said, the timing of Marvel’s move also seems to have been driven at least in part by a desire to offset the effects of raising the price of their standard 32-page comics from 20 to 25 cents — a change which, like the advent of the new “Giant-Size” books, went into effect in February, 1974.  I don’t think it’s by accident that the announcement of the price hike on Marvel’s letters pages went out of its way to promote not only the publisher’s existing line of 75-cent magazines, but also to herald the arrival of the new 35-cent giants, specifically claiming that the latter represented “a bigger bargain than ever” when it came to giving Marvelites value for their money.

And then, there also may have been a more personal motive in play — or at least that’s the impression given by Marvel editor-in-chief Roy Thomas in the “self-indulgent sermonette” which appeared in Giant-Size Super-Stars #1 between its 24-page all-new lead story by Gerry Conway, Rich Buckler, and Joe Sinnott, and the 7 pages of old FF villain pin-ups by Jack Kirby that rounded out the issue:

Thomas’ editorial went on to further discuss the format and content of this premiere issue, emphasizing the novel rotating-lead feature aspect, as well as to preview what would be coming the very next month in Giant-Size Super-Stars #2, as the spotlight turned to Spider-Man.  A few pages later, a half-page house ad further whetted fannish appetites for this coming attraction:

But a funny thing happened on this story’s journey to the spinner rack, as there never would be a Giant-Size Super-Stars #2, whether featuring Spider-Man, the Fantastic Four, Conan the Barbarian, or anyone else.  Instead, the three-way tussle between Spidey, Morbius, and Man-Wolf promised for that issue turned up in the first issue of a new quarterly 35-cent/48-page comic called Giant-Size Super-Heroes.

As you might imagine, an explanation for this unexpected turn of events was proffered on a text page in the middle of the book, once again (and unsurprisingly) scribed by Roy Thomas:

The reasoning behind breaking up one monthly book into three quarterlies makes a good deal of sense; still, that’s a pretty swift course change, right?  What makes the whole scenario even more bizarre is that, if the release date given for Giant-Size Super-Heroes #1 by both the Grand Comics Database and Mike’s Amazing World of Comics is accurate, the book came out on February 19th — a whole week before the release of Giant-Size Super-Stars #1.  It’s possible, of course that both of those esteemed reference resources have got the date wrong; but if they haven’t, it means that many fans must have read Thomas’ “apologia” days ahead of the “sermonette” it’s supposedly apologizing for.  (Personally, I don’t remember buying or reading GSSH #1 prior to perusing GSSS #1, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it didn’t happen that way.)  Which, if you ask me, would tip an already awkward situation into the category of absurdity, if only of a modest sort.

But Marvel was just warming up.  In March, the publisher released its third 35-cent comic, the first issue of Giant-Size Chillers “featuring The Curse of Dracula“, pretty much as originally advertised.  It looked like we should all be able to sit back now and wait for the imminent arrival of the fourth promised “Giant-Size” title, the Defenders-fronted Giant-Size Super-Teams, as well as the debuts of the first titles in “a brand-new line of 60¢, one-hundred-page extravaganzas” (a price-and-size combo identical to DC’s “Super-Spectaculars”, by the way) — Super-Giant Conan, Super-Giant Avengers, and Super-Giant Spider-Man (the latter being distinguished from the existing Giant-Size Super-Heroes by virtue of being a plus-sized take on Marvel Team-Up).

When April came rolling in, however, not a one of those books came with it — at least, not in the precise forms, or with the exact titles, under which they’d been promoted.  Rather, we got the first issue of Giant-Size Creatures “featuring Werewolf by Night” (which was initially supposed to be Giant-Size Chillers #2, remember?) — a comic that as it turned out, was not only the fourth, but also the last, of Marvel’s “Giant-Size” line to be published in the 35-cent, 48-page format.  Also arriving on stands that month were the first issues of Giant-Size Defenders and Giant-Size Spider-Man “and Dracula” — but neither of them matched Thomas’ description of the 60-cent “Super-Giants”.  Rather, these babies sold for the previously unmentioned price of fifty cents, and weighed in at 64 pages, not 96 (which was also the actual page count of DC’s “100-Page Super-Spectaculars”, if you didn’t count their covers).

Once again, the redoubtable Roy Thomas took to the text page of one of the new books — Giant-Size Spider-Man #1, this time — to ‘splain Marvel’s latest course-correction (and for those who may be getting just a little weary of Mr. Thomas’ prose by this point, and would just as soon cut to the chase, let it be known that the reason had to do with “the Numbers” — i.e., money.  Imagine that.):

Got it?  I hope so, because this “illuminating introduction” represents the last word (more or less) on the myriad variations on and adjustments to Marvel’s fledgling “Giant-Size” format, which pretty well settled down after this month.  So, after yielding to the irresistible temptation to note the irony of Thomas’ not-so-subtle dig as DC for filling most of their “Super-Spectaculars” with reprint material — more specifically, with “a lot of reprints of 1940’s heroes that nobody’s heard of in thirty years or more” (this from a huge Golden Age comics fan whose ready willingness to revive obscure old ’40s superheroes at the drop of a hat would prove to be one of the hallmarks of his career) — we’ll leave Rascally Roy alone for the remainder of this post.  (Well, we’ll try, at least)  Again, all of the reasoning behind the changes, as outlined at length by the Marvel EIC, makes sense — but the fact that all of these developments happened over a mere three-month period, and in full public view, is pretty remarkable.

Along with the customary spring flowers, the month of May, 1974 saw the sprouting of two more new large-format comics —  Giant-Size Avengers (in which Roy Thomas… um… brought back an obscure ’40s hero named the Whizzer; OK, now we’re done) and Giant-Size Man-Thing (which had originally been titled Giant-Size Monsters), as well as the second issue of what had initially been called Giant-Size Super-Stars, but was now simply Giant-Size Fantastic Four.  The transition of the original clutch of “Giant-Size” comics from their 35-cent/48-page format incarnations continued into June, as Giant-Size Dracula #2 (rather than Giant-Size Chillers #2) arrived in spinner racks.

June would also bring the debuts of Marvel’s last two “Giant-Size” titles, at least for the time being.  The first of these was Giant-Size Conan — which, oddly enough, seems to have been one of the earliest releases planned (per Marvel’s full-page house ad from February, which named Conan the Barbarian as one of the three rotating lead features of the “monthly” Giant-Size Super-Stars) but ultimately took longer than most to bring to market.  The second was the title which, according to Roy Thomas in his “illuminating” Giant-Size Spider-Man #1 editorial, replaced the now-defunct solo-Spidey-starring vehicle, Giant-Size Super-Heroes, on Marvel’s publishing schedule.

Its name, of course, was Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu.

Master of Kung Fu bore the distinction of being the newest of all the Marvel features who were given a second, quarterly showcase via the “Giant-Size” line.  Even so, the move probably came as little surprise to most comics industry observers.  The martial arts genre was the hot pop-culture fad of the moment — or so it was at least perceived to be by comic-book publishers — and Marvel was intent on seizing (and squeezing) that moment as hard as it possibly could.

Beginning life as a lead feature in the 15th issue of the previously reprint-only, bimonthly title Special Marvel Edition, then taking over that title’s numbering with #17, then going monthly following #19 (its first monthly issue arrived in June, the same month as GSMoKF #1)  Master of Kung Fu had already spawned one sort-of spin-off — the black-and-white 75-cent magazine, The Deadly Hands of Kung Fu, whose first issue had hit stands in February (the same month, incidentally, that Marvel raised its “standard” size comics’ price to 25 cents, and debuted its new 35-centers), and which featured Shang-Chi as the lead among several comics features.  Adding a third, “Giant-Size” vehicle for the estranged son of Fu Manchu might not quite have ranked as a no-brainer; but in the summer of ’74, it came pretty dang close.

The main Master of Kung Fu title had been going through some creative changes of late, with both of Shang-Chi’s originators — artist Jim Starlin and writer Steve Englehart — having left the series with issues #17 and #19, respectively.  The latest issue, #20 — which came out just one week prior to Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu #1 itself — featured artwork by Paul Gulacy (Starlin’s heir apparent as of #18) and a script by a pair of writers — Gerry Conway, to whom the first half was attributed, and Doug Moench, who was credited with the second half.  Naturally, going forward, only one of the two would have the gig on the regular — and that one was Moench, who would remain on MoKF all the way to issue #122, some eight years hence… a remarkable run that got an additional preview in June, 1974, as Moench not only knocked off another Shang-Chi tale for Deadly Hands of Kung Fu #3, but also provided the scripts for all three of the new stories that filled the majority of GSMoKF #1’s pages.  (For the record, his 4 1/2 Shang-Chi stories represented only a fraction of the prolific writer’s Marvel output this month, which also included work in Vampire Tales #6, Frankenstein #12, Monsters Unleashed #7, Creatures on the Loose #31 [featuring Man-Wolf], Marvel Premiere #17 [featuring Iron Fist], Planet of the Apes #1, and Werewolf by Night #21.)

Wait, did I just say all three of the new stories?  I imagine that some of you who can remember all the way back to the beginning of this post may even now be objecting, as you can clearly recall that big blurb on the cover of GSMoKF #1 that very specifically promised “5 all-new steel-smashing sagas starring the one and only Shang-Chi!”  Alas, I’m afraid that that promise will prove to be inaccurate, in more ways than one — though a full explanation of that fact will have to wait a bit.

For now, let’s move on to the issue’s lead story, which finds Moench joined not only by Paul Gulacy on pencils, but by Gulacy’s “sponsor” at Marvel, the veteran artist Dan Adkins, on inks …

The street signs for Madison Ave. and 57th St. immediately identify our story’s locale as New York City — a fact that will be of some interest as we proceed through the issue…

Gulacy gives us some pretty wild foreshortening in that last panel above, no question; it’s probably worth noting that this was only his sixth published pencilling job for Marvel, and the young artist was, understandably, still figuring out what worked and what didn’t.

Shang-Chi takes out the blade-wielding assassin fairly quickly, then turns his attention to the nunchaku user…

The scene now shifts to the lair of Shang’s dad, Fu Manchu…

A lot of the stories in these “Giant-Size” comics were broken into numbered and titled chapters — presumably, to emphasize the fact that these were longer-than-standard yarns — and such is the case with the 24-page “Death Masque!”:

As best as I’ve been able to determine, in 1974 the Comics Code didn’t specifically prohibit the subject of prostitution from being addressed directly; even so, the publishers seemed inclined to be circumspect when dealing with the topic.

Shang’s opponent manages to snare his arm with the chain of his weapon — though that’s not necessarily to the former’s advantage…

Well, that took a turn, didn’t it?  It’s interesting, I think, that Shang-Chi is not shown to be resisting the advances of his new female acquaintance until after the garrote comes out.

In his parlor, Fu Manchu receives another message…

Something feels off here, at least to me.  Obviously, Shang couldn’t have dragged the original dummy all the way from where he’d originally encountered it in the first part of the story, but the script offers little justification for his oh-so-very-convenient discovery of a duplicate effigy “outside this council chamber”.  Perhaps there were some crossed signals between Moench and Gulacy as the story progressed through its plotting, drawing, and scripting stages, though that’s pure speculation on my part.  In any event, this particular segment of the narrative is a tad unconvincing in in its execution… though, naturally, it’s easy enough to set any quibbles aside once the action gets going again…

Outside of a bobble or two here and there, “Death Masque!” remains an effective one-off story, even if it only offers a hint of the excellence that the Doug Moench-Paul Gulacy team would achieve in the future.  And it is a one-off, regardless of the last panel’s ominous references to Fu Manchu’s journey to a mysterious destination in “the heart of America” — because the remaining stories in this issue take place in Miami, Florida (where the events of the main Master of Kung Fu book had recently taken our hero), and whatever else you might say about that city, I don’t believe that anyone would describe it as being located in America’s “heartland”.  (Presumably, Moench originally expected that a different story would follow directly after this one, whether in Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu or in the monthly series.  My best bet is that that story was supposed to be “A Fortune of Death!” in MoKF #22 [Nov., 1974], which centers on a plot by Fu to destroy the Mount Rushmore National Memorial — despite the fact that, as published, the two narratives don’t join up together all that well.)

At this point, my younger self knew P. Craig Russell primarily as an artist who’d done a couple of stories for Marvel’s “mystery” anthologies, as well as a bit of work on Conan the Barbarian, and a fairly striking Doctor Strange story in Marvel Premiere.  His one continuing assignment to date had been the short-lived Ant-Man series in Marvel Feature, which I’d passed on… as I was also soon to do with the work that would ultimately make his name.  That work, of course, was Russell’s run on “The War of the Worlds” in Amazing Adventures — a run which would be starting up in October, 1974, just four months out from this story’s publication.

Like Paul Gulacy, Russell was an Ohioan, and a protege of Dan Adkins; also like Gulacy, he still had a fair amount of development to get through before he’d arrive at the ornately decorative style for which he’d ultimately be renowned.  That said, you can still see glimmers of the artist’s more mature mode in this briskly-paced 8-pager.

Shang’s fellow museum-goers go on to discuss how the museum itself will doubtlessly ransom the stolen statue back from them before the Buddhist group that loaned it out even knows it’s gone.  Naturally, they have no idea that Shang has heard every word they’ve said…

The museum guard will have cause to regret his cavalier dismissal of Shang-Chi’s warning some four hours later, when the trio of thieves show up at the museum and, after picking the lock to gain entrance, knock him senseless with a lead pipe…

Honestly, does Fu Manchu really not have anything better to do with his time than eff around with his son’s day out at the museum?  This story isn’t quite as satisfying as the longer one that preceded it — though, short as it is, it’s over before it can wear out its welcome.  And Russell’s artwork, though rather rudimentary by his later high standards, is still enjoyable enough on its own terms.

Say, do you remember how one of this issue’s cover blurbs promised that the prospective buyer of Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu #1 would be getting five brand-new new stories starring Shang-Chi for their fifty cents?  And how I said that that blurb was more than a little misleading?  Well, we’ve now come to “Exhibit A” for that assertion:  a two-page non-fiction piece (hardly a “story”) featuring… Iron Fist.

This strip is signed on the first page by Frank McLaughlin (who, not so coincidentally, was himself a martial arts enthusiast, and the co-creator of the pioneering martial arts-themed superhero Judomaster in the 1960s), and the Grand Comics Database attributes the script as well as the art for “Shaolin Temple Boxing” to the veteran pro.  Regardless of who was responsible for what, it’s a nicely illustrated piece, though I can’t speak to the accuracy of the information it proffers.  (As for why it employs Iron Fist rather than this comic’s titular star, my best guess is that it was originally intended for Deadly Hands of Kung Fu, in which Iron Fist would occasionally appear in his own strip alongside those of Shang-Chi, the Sons of the Tiger, and other feature characters.)

GSMoKF #1s fourth feature is a bona fide story, at least — though, since it’s not a new one, and Shang-Chi doesn’t show his face anywhere within its eight pages, it can’t help but serve as “Exhibit B” for the lack of truth in advertising demonstrated by our offending cover blurb:

All of Marvel’s “Giant-Size” comics contained some reprint material — and seeing as how the martial arts genre was still a new phenomenon (at least so far as American comics were concerned), with the result that there was very little (if any) material in that vein available in the publisher’s archives, you can understand why Marvel chose to lean instead into the Fu Manchu angle with this reprint of the very first Yellow Claw story, as produced by the team of writer Al Feldstein and artist Joe Maneely, and published in Yellow Claw #1 (Oct., 1956).  (The introductory splash page shown above is a repurposed version of that comic’s cover, also by Maneely.)  Of course, for many contemporary readers (as well as for at least some readers in the 1970s, of course) this choice simply underscores the culturally insensitive Orientalism that would unfortunately continue to mar the Master of Kung Fu feature throughout its original run.

Moving on, we come to this issue’s fifth and final feature — which also happens to be its third (ahem) Shang-Chi story:

As noted near the beginning of this post (assuming you can remember that far back), the cover of Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu #1 was the work of penciller Ron Wilson and inker Mike Esposito — the same art team responsible for illustrating the 8-page “Reflections in a Rippled Pool” that closes out the issue.

Esposito was of course an old hand, whose career had begun in the early 1950s; Wilson, however, was yet another new young artist, who’d broken in at Marvel in 1972, but up to this time had primarily worked on covers.

Two additional would-be assassins follow Shang into the building — but though he’s aware of their presence, he chooses for now to focus on the gunman still waiting on the roof.  After reaching the building’s top floor, he opts not to proceed on up the stairs to the roof’s door, but rather to take a less direct route…

The third and final assailant goes crashing through the window of the next building’s roof, and Shang, after a moment’s consideration, follows him by making the same leap.  Upon catching up with his quarry, our hero is greeted by more than one familiar face…

The ironic — and even somewhat poignant — twist at the end of this short yarn helps edge it a little ahead of “Frozen Past, Shattered Memories” to rank as the issue’s second best story, at least in terms of its plot and script (I personally prefer Russell’s art, crude though it may be in relation to his later stuff, to the more straightforward, meant-and-potatoes work of Wilson and Esposito, but your mileage may vary.)

Anyway, that’s a wrap for the premiere issue of Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu — a very enjoyable package overall, and one I’m sure my sixteen-year-old self thought was worth the half a dollar he spent on it, back in the day.  It’s also a fine example of what could be accomplished in Marvel’s “Giant-Size” format… once they’d finally worked out all the bugs, that is.


As we noted earlier in the post, Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu #1 came out just a week after Master of Kung Fu #20.  Between them, these comics featured the earliest collaborations between the two men who would follow MoKF‘s originators, Steve Englehart and Jim Starlin, as the series’ second great creative team: namely, Doug Moench and Paul Gulacy.  But though the pieces for the feature’s next major phase of development now seemed to be in place, for some reason it took a fair amount of time for the Moench-Gulacy combo to fully lock in.

After pencilling three issues of the monthly Master of Kung Fu title in a row — in addition to the 24-page lead story in GSMoKF #1 and a 15-page Shag-Chi tale for Deadly Hands of Kung Fu #3 — Gulacy was absent for MoKF #21, which featured instead the return of Ron Wilson as artist  Gulacy showed up again for #22, but was gone again just as quickly.  The next six issues featured an ever-changing roster of pencillers, including Wilson, Al Milgrom, Keith Pollard, John Buscema, Ed Hannigan… and Gulacy, who returned long enough to draw both issue #25 and a 40-page lead story for Giant-Size Master of Kung Fu #2 before slipping away once more.  Meanwhile, Doug Moench seemed to be having some trouble finding his footing on the strip as well.  Most if not all of his stories in this period featured yet another fruitless attempt to kill (or at least seriously mess with) his errant offspring, leading one to wonder just how formidable the insidious “Devil-Doctor” truly was.

It wasn’t until Master of Kung Fu #29 that everything seemed at last to click.  With that issue, Gulacy settled in to stay for a good long run (albeit one that saw occasional interruptions) that would last through MoKF #50; and Moench rose to the occasion, as the series moved firmly into a super-spy thriller mode in which Fu Manchu was only one of multiple menaces to world security that needed to be dealt with by Sir Denis Nayland Smith and his team of agents, which now officially included Shang-Chi.  The splash page of #29 included a blurb trumpeting “a blisteringly volatile new direction” — and this time, the blurb’s claim was right on the money.  Master of Kung Fu was off to the races at last, as Moench and his primary artistic collaborators — first Gulacy, then Mike Zeck, and finally Gene Day — proceeded to produce one of the most consistently fine comic-book series of the 1970s and early 1980s.

Unfortunately, by the time Master of Kung Fu #29 arrived on stands, your humble blogger had already moved on.  I’m honestly not sure exactly when I dropped out, and my physical comics collection doesn’t offer me many clues… though for an opposite reason than that which I described in my Planet of the Apes #1 post of a few days ago.  There, as you may recall, I explained how I can’t figure out when I stopped buying PotA because I don’t own any of my copies any more; in the case of MoKF, however, I own plenty of individual issues… but most of them were bought on the collectors’ market years later, after the scales had finally fallen from my eyes and I realized what I’d been missing.

Of course, due to the self-imposed rules of this blog, that means that I won’t be writing any further posts regarding the rising and advancing of Shang-Chi’s spirit as he grapples with the moral ambiguities inherent in the espionage world’s “games of death and deceit”… at least, not until our rolling fifty-year-old window of opportunity opens on to Master of Kung Fu #114 — the next issue of the series that I’m sure I bought new off the stands… even though by that time, “the stands” referred to the new books display at my local comics retailer, rather than the spinner rack at my nearest convenience store.

So — see you in April, 2032, everyone?

Additional cover art credits, per the Grand Comics Database and Mike’s Amazing World of Comics:

  • Giant-Size Super-Stars #1 (May, 1974): Rich Buckler and Joe Sinnott
  • Giant-Size Super-Heroes #1 (Jun, 1974): Gil Kane (?) and John Romita
  • Giant-Size Chillers #1 (Jun., 1974): John Romita
  • Giant-Size Creatures #1 (Jul., 1974): Ron Wilson (or Don Perlin?) and Frank Giacoia
  • Giant-Size Defenders #1 (Jul., 1974): Gil Kane (and John Romita?) and Frank Giacoia
  • Giant-Size Spider-Man #1 (Jul., 1974): John Romita
  • Giant-Size Avengers #1 (Aug., 1974): Rich Buckler and John Romita
  • Giant-Size Man-Thing #1 (Aug., 1974): Mike Ploog
  • Giant-Size Conan #1 (Sep., 1974): Gil Kane (and John Romita?) and Ernie Chan
  • Deadly Hands of Kung Fu #1 (Apr., 1974): Neal Adams
  • Master of Kung Fu #20 (Sep., 1974): Gil Kane (and John Romita?) and Frank Giacoia
  • Master of Kung Fu #21 (Oct., 1974): Herb Trimpe (or John Romita, or Ron Wilson) and Mike Esposito
  • Master of Kung Fu #114 (Jul., 1982): Gene Day

22 comments

  1. Steven AKA Speed Paste Robot · 2 Days Ago

    Another fun and thorough post. Thanks!

    FWIW I think you can loosen your self imposed blogging rules anytime the mood strikes you. Or not! It’s your sandbox after all 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

    • Steve McBeezlebub · 1 Day Ago

      Or do a side blog very occasionally titled ‘Books I Skipped 50 Years Ago’.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. drhaydn · 2 Days Ago

    Ah, some classic Doug Moench!

    I really appreciated the use of captions rather than thought balloons–gave the whole thing a hard-boiled detective novel feel. Artie Simek’s distinctive lettering (with the uncredited help of his daughter, Jean Simek Izzo in the final chapter) helped set the mood.

    Were the backup stories intended for the B&W magazines? The casual racism seemed particularly out of place for a four-color comic intended for kids, though the comics code censors were laxer in the 1970s than at any other time in their history.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Steve McBeezlebub · 1 Day Ago

    I like Mench’s writing but TBH Gulacy and Day left me cold. Still do. Not that art decides if I buy a book. I’d buy Liefeld if it were written by Bendis or McCay. Shang Chi always has and probably always will bore me. I did buy most of the Zeck run because, you know, Zeck, but that’s it. The two colors used for Asian skin tones back then bothered me too but because they looked bad. I don’t think I lived anywhere you could call racially diverse as a minor so my thoughts on racism didn’t occur young.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. frednotfaith2 · 1 Day Ago

    Enjoyed your overview of both the weird history (hey, sounds like that should have been a DC mag back then!) of the Giant-Size comics as well as of GSMOKF #1 itself! The only one I got new off the racks was Giant-Size Super-Heroes featuring Spider-Man vs. Morbius & Man-Wolf for 35 cents. I hadn’t realized the background of newsstand economics in the efforts of DC & Marvel to push larger, more expensive comics. For me, getting those would have meant me purchasing fewer comics overall. Thomas’ hype and explanations from the time were somewhat amusing. I can sympathize with his situation, promoting one version of the project and then having to explain why that fell through and this and later that change was necessary, including trying to reduce confusion for the vendors selling them back in those days before UPCs and scanners.

    As to the issue at hand, I did eventually get this but must honestly say I found most of the content underwhelming, aside from the historical aspect as showing the styles of Moench, Gulacy & Russell still developing. Fu Manchu’s ongoing efforts to have Shang Chi murdered are becoming more ridiculous and tiresome than entertaining, IMO, at this point and clearly a significant change in direction was required, which really began with MoKF #29, which began a genuine rise to greatness for the mag. Alas, I’d only gotten one issue of MoKF prior to issue 53, #24 (and I have absolutely no recall as to why I got that issue but not any others back then), so by the time I started collecting the mag, Gulacy was already gone, aside from providing some excellent covers. When I did start collecting, however, one of the things I liked about it was the supporting cast. As a 12 year old 50 years ago, I might not have thought things out deeply enough to say exactly what made particular comics resonate with me more than others, but I did really like more realistic interactions between a variety of characters who had distinct personalities. Englehart introduced several characters but in his short run hadn’t really integrated them all into the series to any great extent — Shang Chi was still most often wandering around on his own until one of Daddy’s assassins showed up and a fight scene ensued, which is pretty much what this issue is all about. Part of the change of direction was getting rid of that trope and giving Chi a more genuine social life in the present rather than flashbacks to life under father Fu’s watchful gaze and everyone he used to be chums with but who now want to kill him on daddy’s orders.

    Also, when Chi is just wandering around on his own, I can’t help but wonder, how the heck is he feeding himself, paying for shelter on stormy nights, replacing his “pajamas” when they become too torn up or soiled while fighting daddy’s goons? Of course, many comics writers may write some characters and emphasize how truly independent they are, “hey, I don’t need no stinking job, I’m not beholden to anyone!” without explaining how they have any spending money at all. I expect a follow-up along the lines of, “uh, by the way, buddy, can you spare a tenner? or even a five dollar bill? I’m dying for a Big Mac! With fries! I also need to fill up my Punisher-mobile.” Maybe that sort of thing occurs to my older self because I’ve encountered so many of those people living on the sidewalks and whatever spaces they can find in the downtown area where I work, and whom I’m sure are pretty much ubiquitous in nearly all big cities. Real people have to have some means of financial support.

    Liked by 3 people

    • frasersherman · 1 Day Ago

      While the 1960s revival of the Archie Comics superheroes was notoriously campy, in hindsight I do appreciate that the Shield (son of the original) is constantly broke and out of work because he’s always having to ditch his job to fight crime.

      Liked by 3 people

  5. John Minehan · 1 Day Ago

    I liked that book.

    As good as Moench and Gulacy were, the things I liked most in that series were the Maneely and Kirby (I later learned, inking himself) Yellow Claw reprints.

    Up until the issue, well, at issue, I had assumed Stan Lee wrote all the Timely/Atlas stuff (as he had for early Marvel) and was shocked by the Feldstein credit.

    The 1957 distribution crisis changed a lot . . . .

    Wasn’t this Yellow Claw issue the last new work by Maneely (as opposed to work done for inventory that got the Bullpen fired) to see print after Maneely’s death?

    Liked by 2 people

    • drhaydn · 1 Day Ago

      I believe Maneely was back doing new work for Atlas in early 1958 just before his unfortunate fatal accident.

      Liked by 2 people

      • John Minehan · 1 Day Ago

        That is interesting, I knew he had started free lancing at DC at about this time and I was not sure where this fell on the time line . . . .

        Liked by 1 person

        • drhaydn · 1 Day Ago

          From Michael Vassallo’s blog, Timely-Atlas Comics, “Stan Lee: The Timely Years” (December 8, 2018). This would mean that Maneely resumed working for Stan Lee in late 1957:

          “New western stories with “P” numbers came back in Two-Gun KidKid Colt OutlawGunsmoke Western and Wyatt Earp cover dated Feb-Mar-Apr, 1958, with Stan writing all the character features for Joe Maneely, Jack Keller and Dick Ayers.”

          “On June 7, 1958, in the midst of drawing the Two-Gun KidMrs. Lyons’ Cubs [a newspaper strip], and rendering most of the non-teen, non-romance covers, Joe Maneely, Stan Lee’s fastest, top artistic collaborator, and friend, died on the way back home by train. Stan must have been shell-shocked. The very last thing Joe drew was the splash to Two-Gun Kid #45, #T-67, cover date Dec/58 and published on September 2, 1958.”

          Liked by 2 people

          • John Minehan · 20 Hours Ago

            Around that time, Jack Kirby came back and wrote about how upset Lee was. Some people have speculated that Lee was not exaggerating and the reason was Maneely’;s tragic death.

            Kirby had largely been away from Timely & Atlas since the early 1940s and might only have known Maneely from taking over the Yellow Claw book and looking at the first issue to get the gist of the story and the design.

            Liked by 2 people

            • John Minehan · 20 Hours Ago

              “KIRBY (not Lee) was not exacerbating . . . . Sorry!

              Like

            • drhaydn · 19 Hours Ago

              Kirby was back at Atlas within a couple of days of Maneely’s death. It makes the most sense to me that Lee called Kirby to offer him the work that Maneely would have been doing.

              Liked by 1 person

  6. DontheArtistformerlyknownasfrodo628 · 1 Day Ago

    I don’t have a lot to say about this one, and honestly, don’t have a lot of time to say it (busy day!). I’ve already mentioned I wasn’t interested in martial arts books when I was 16 and don’t have much interest in them now. I enjoyed the Shang Chi movie several years ago, and have enjoyed many films and TV series that have incorporated martial arts, but that’s because in films, you get to see the style and grace of the fighting, something you don’t get in a comic, no matter who drew it.

    Speaking of drawing, Gulacy and Russell are both due for huge upgrades in their ability right around the corner and they can’t come soon enough. It’s hard to imagine that the guy who drew the later War of the Worlds or the Elric comics drew this unpleasant-looking comics story. Same for the Gulacy story as well. The confident and skilled artist who stepped in at #29 is barely recognizable in the generically rendered story here. Once Shang Chi entered the spy/espionage realm, the books did get better. I even read a few from time to time. None of it was enough to make me run out and collect back issues or reassess my opinion of martial arts books, but hey, you can’t have everything. Thanks, Alan.

    Liked by 1 person

    • DontheArtistformerlyknownasfrodo628 · 1 Day Ago

      Also, while I’m kvetching, did anybody else notice Shang Chi’s thought comment in the third chapter of Death Masque, when he pointed out that his opponent, one of his father’s Si-Fan assassins, had been trained “the art of Samurai, but not in caution.” This is another case of Marvel writers getting their cultures confused, isn’t it? An Asian warrior uses a sword, so he must be a Samurai, when Samurai are part of the Japanese culture, not the Chinese culture that produced Shang Chi and Fu Manchu. Can I still get a No-Prize for this one??

      Liked by 3 people

  7. DontheArtistformerlyknownasfrodo628 · 1 Day Ago

    Well, it seems Word Press just ate my comment and deleted it. While I wait for Alan to free it from limbo and give it wings, Let me also add, that in addition to the poor coloring choices for Asian characters, I was a little surprised and taken aback that someone called Shang Chi a “chink,” in the story, not once but twice! Shame on you, Mr. Moench and shame on you, Marvel. Even in 1974, you both should have known better.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. frasersherman · 1 Day Ago

    I looked at the first issue because I was a Fu Manchu fan, put it down because they got him wrong (the story has Fu Manchu breaking his word. He doesn’t), only glanced at it occasionally after that. Tried it in college because my best friend was into it but Moench is very hit-or-miss with me, sliding from “really thoughtful character study and philosophical depth” to “windy pretentious crap” — and the one I picked up fell on the windy pretentious crap side so adieu. Such is life.

    Not only is Fu Manchu going to all that trouble in the museum heist story petty, it’s hard to see how he put the robbery together so fast — it’s not like Shang-Chi bought tickets to the exhibit weeks in advance. Generally I hate it when characters reduce a villain’s ambitions to “I want to bring pain on you!” because it usually makes them pathetic (see the Master in most recent Doctor Who stories or the Joker in the past decade of Batman).

    I must have been aware of all that stuff about the changing formats because I would have flipped through the book on the stands. Didn’t remember any of it until this post though.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. brucesfl · 1 Day Ago

    Regarding Giant Size Super Heroes 1 which featured Spider-Man, Morbius and Man-Wolf, I was avidly buying Marvel comics in 1974 at the time they came out at the newsstands, and I distinctly remember buying GSSH 1 in mid March 1974 when it first came out, so sorry, I believe the information in the Grand Comics Database and elsewhere is incorrect. I also remember buying GSSS 1 (Thing v Hulk) at the end of February 1974 and not seeing a trace of GSSH 1. I believe these sources which are usually quite reliable made a mistake and as you said Alan, it doesn’t make sense that the GSSH 1 would have come out first.

    I found your discussion of the giant size books really interesting. It’s clear that Marvel wanted to find some way to compete with DC’s 100 page books which I have read were very profitable for DC at the time. I did not remember all the details of the changing situation of the Marvel giant size books but I do remember buying most of those giant size books, which only lasted from 1974 to 1975, and then Marvel took this odd step in the summer of 1975 of turning all their giant size books into reprint books and even adding some extra giant size books (in effect flooding the market with these books). In 1976 Marvel would return to all new annuals for nearly all of their monthly books over the year.

    With respect to GS MOKF 1, I definitely remember buying this issue, but did not remember much about the contents. I did not remember that there was early Craig Russell art here…very interesting. It was interesting to note how Paul Gulacy was beginning to develop. I believe that Gulacy worked on the next 2 giant size issues as well, which is why he may have missed some issues of the regular series. It’s fascinating to consider that Doug Moench was thrown into the far end of the pool really fast. He just started writing MOKF, it suddenly went monthly and now he also was expected to write giant size issues and stories for the Deadly Hands magazine which soon also went monthly, in addition to everything else he was writing. And it did take him awhile to find his footing. And of course the set up of MOKF was a problem too. Fu Manchu was supposed to be this brilliant diabolical master villain who wanted to kill his son, but of course could never succeed. If that was the basis of every issue (which was currently happening) Fu Manchu would look pretty lame. Eventually Doug realized that (although it took about a year) and took Fu Manchu off the table for awhile. The high point for me was the following year with the new direction in MOKF 29-31 and some really outstanding artwork by Paul Gulacy. And yet MOKF 31 would be my last issue of the series for 4 years. I don’t recall the exact reason for my dropping MOKF; either I missed MOKF 32 and decided not to continue buying the series or saw that Gulacy had not drawn MOKF 32 and thought he had left. In retrospect it is a decision I greatly regret. When I did return (when the team was Moench, Zeck and Day), I searched out back issues and found the excellent stories I had missed (especially classic work from Gulacy in 38-50) and stayed with the book until its end. I wrote a number of letters to this team, and actually received a letter back from the late Gene Day. Doug Moench, once he found his way, wrote a very special book with great supporting characters, and wonderful art from Paul Gulacy, Mike Zeck, Gene Day, and others, that I fondly remember to this day. Thanks Alan!

    Liked by 3 people

  10. Alan Stewart · 1 Day Ago

    Apologies to everyone who may be having WordPress problems today. I’m going to dig down into the settings to see if there’s anything to tweak, but in the meantime, if you can let me know if any of your comments aren’t getting through, like Don did earlier, I’ll appreciate it.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. brucesfl · 12 Hours Ago

    Regarding your comments about the Giant-Size Marvel issues in general, I thought I would add a few additional historical notes: even though Marvel had a significant expansion of titles since 1972, they had not expanded their staff to some extent but not that significantly, so keeping up with this new influx of titles and new material was very challenging, and if I remember correctly they had lost Gary Friedrich by this time (so Doug Moench who had been working on the black and white magazines was an important new addition to the color comic staff). I mention this because Giant Size Defenders 1, for example, consisted of reprints and a new framing sequence and had very little to do with the main book. When GSD 1 appeared in April 1974, the Defenders was still a bi-monthly book but it would go monthly in June 1974 and most likely its sales were quite healthy (possibly helped by 1973’s Avengers-Defenders War). Giant Size Spider-Man 1 (with Dracula) also had an odd back story. According to an interview with Marv Wolfman some years ago, he was asked to write that book but refused because he did not want to team up Dracula with any Marvel heroes. Len Wein ended up writing the book, which made sense since he was currently writing the similarly themed Marvel Team-Up. Len wrote the book in such a manner that Spider-Man and Dracula never even met even though they were in the same story. As a side note Marv did guest star Dr. Strange and later the Silver Surfer in the Tomb of Dracula series. Otherwise he managed to avoid other Marvel superheroes in the Dracula series. Returning to the main subject of discussion (Shang Chi), Len had Spider-Man team up with Shang Chi in Giant Size Spider-Man 2 in July 1974. Unfortunately I missed that issue although I understand it was pretty good.

    With respect to the deadline challenges for certain giant size books, I understand that in August 1974, Rich Buckler was having difficulties meeting his deadlines for FF 152 and Giant Size FF 3. I understand that Jim Mooney had to complete FF 152 under a very tight deadline that was nearly missed. And with GS FF 3, plotted by Conway and written by Wolfman, according to interviews, Buckler had drawn what were practically stick figures and it was left to Joe Sinnott to complete everything which he did under another tough deadline. In retrospect it was amazing that a lot of the Giant Size books got done. But I know that you will be discussing another Giant Size book that came out in August 1974 that is probably one of the best comics of all time so I look forward to that review.

    Liked by 2 people

    • frednotfaith2 · 7 Hours Ago

      Regarding the Defenders, having refreshed my memory on the Marvel Database site, it went monthly with issue 7continued as such during the summer of 1973 and the clash with the Avengers. But with Englehart’s departure after issue 11, it went back to bi-monthly for a period, actually skipping two months between issues 12 (Feb ’74 cover date) & 13 (May ’74 cover date), then back to a regular monthly schedule starting with issue 15 (Sept. ’74) and afterwards. I have no idea what brought about the change in publication schedule between issues 11 – 15 and I’m not aware of any other regular title in that era in which there was a two month gap between issues and whether that was planned due to complications with Wein’s schedule or if there was some snafu by which issue 13 wasn’t published when it should have been under the bi-monthly schedule.

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.